HOME


Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



image hosted by ImageVenue.com








 Subscribe in a reader






Infomania

Buzzflash
Cursor
Raw Story
Salon
Slate
Prospect
New Republic
Common Dreams
AmericanPoliticsJournal
Smirking Chimp
Crisis Papers



MediA-Go-Go

BagNewsNotes
Crooks and Liars
CJR Daily
DailyHowler
MediaNews
consortium news
Scoobie Davis
Take Back The Media




Blog-o-rama

The Big Con
American Street
Eschaton
Demosthenes
James Wolcott
Ezra Klein
D-Day
Matthew Yglesias
Political Animal
Sisyphus Shrugged
Glenn Greenwald
Rick Perlstein
Firedoglake
Martini Revolution
The Unapologetic Mexican Taylor Marsh
Spocko's Brain
Big Brass Blog
Rsspect
Talk Left
Donkey Rising
Suburban Guerrilla
Paperweight's Fair Shot
corrente
Pacific Views
Echidne
TAPPED
Talking Points Memo
pandagon
Daily Kos
MyDD
Electrolite
Americablog
Group News Blog
Tom Tomorrow
Jon Swift
Left Coaster
Angry Bear
Dr Biobrain
Rooks Rant
The Poorman
Seeing the Forest
Cathie From Canada
Max Speaks
Majikthis
Brad DeLong
The Sideshow
Liberal Oasis
BartCop
War and Piece
Juan Cole
Mark Kleiman
Rising Hegemon
alicublog
Orcinus
Unqualified Offerings
Martin Wisse
Mad Kane
Blah3.com
Off the Kuff
Public Nuisance
Nathan Newman
Alas, A Blog
Fanatical Apathy
RogerAiles
Lean Left
Oliver Willis
Ruminate This
skippy the bush kangaroo
Slacktivist
uggabugga
Crooked Timber
discourse.net
Amygdala
the talking dog
David E's Fablog
Nitpicker
Prometheus 6
busybusybusy
A Level Gaze
dr limerick
Into the Breach
Prometheus Speaks
longstoryshortpier
hellblazer
Democratic Veteran
Gail Online
mfinley
Liberal Desert
Cobb the Blog
Pen-Elayne
A Brooklyn Bridge
The Agonist
Dratfink
Wampum Blog
Tom Moody
Nobody Knows Anything
Common Sense
Byzantium's Shores
Something's Got To Break







Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com

digby@writeme.com

01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003 02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003 04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008 08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008 10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008 11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009 01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009 03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009 04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009 05/01/2009 - 06/01/2009 06/01/2009 - 07/01/2009 07/01/2009 - 08/01/2009




 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo



Thursday, May 24, 2007

 
Missin' It

by digby


Atrios mentioned this unusually obtuse Jack Shafer article in Slate in which he writes that Gore's critique of the media is all about Britney Spears:

Al Gore and Thomas L. Friedman have co-discovered what ails our country. It's national inattention to the most important issues.

Gore blamed the obsession with celebrity culture for the republic's poor condition earlier this week on Good Morning America. Talking to Diane Sawyer, he accused both the people and the press of focusing on "Britney and K-Fed and Anna Nicole Smith and all this stuff, meanwhile, very quietly, our country has been making some very serious mistakes that could be avoided if we the people, including the news media, are involved in a full and vigorous discussion of what our choices are."

[...[

Gore is right to fault celebrity news for blotting out coverage of climate change, health care, immigration, and international relations in such policy journals as People, Star, In Touch, and US Weekly and on such public-affairs programs as Access Hollywood, Entertainment Tonight, and E! News. But a more generous definition of the press—one that includes daily newspapers, weekly magazines, general-interest TV news, and the Web—would find Gore's argument lacking. By my back-of-the envelope estimate, your average big-city daily carries more news about immigration (or other significant issue du jour) in one day than it does about every celebrity on the planet in a full week.


He went on to cleverly suggest that Gore should actually take issue with sports because far more people read the sports page. This is, of course, silly, as Atrios pointed out, and a dreadful misreading of Gore's specific critique, which is about the trivialization and tabloidization of the news media, and more specifically the trivialization of political news.

So, when Shafer wrote this, I could hardly believe it:

Maureen Dowd showcases Gore's critique in her New York Times column today.


In case you missed it, here's what Modo wrote:

It’s no wonder Al Gore is a little touchy about his weight, what with everyone trying to read his fat cells like tea leaves to see if he’s going to run.

He was so determined to make his new book look weighty, in the this-treatise-belongs-on-the-shelf-between-Plato-and-Cato sense, rather than the double-chin-isn’t-quite-gone-yet sense, that he did something practically unheard of for a politician: He didn’t plaster his picture on the front.

“The Assault on Reason” looks more like the Beatles’ White Album than a screed against the tinny Texan who didn’t get as many votes in 2000.

The Goracle does concede a small author’s picture on the inside back flap, a chiseled profile that screams Profile in Courage and that also screams Really Old Picture. Indeed, if you read the small print next to the wallet-sized photo of Thin Gore looking out prophetically into the distance, it says it’s from his White House years.

[...]


Diane was not so easily put off as he turned up his nose at the horse race and the vast wasteland of TV, and bored in for the big question: “Donna Brazile, your former campaign manager, has said, ‘If he drops 25 to 30 pounds, he’s running.’ Lost any weight?”

Laughing obligingly, he replied: “I think, you know, millions of Americans are in the same struggle I am on that one. But look, listen to your questions. And you know, if the horse race, the cosmetic parts of this — and look, that’s all understandable and natural. But while we’re focused on, you know, Britney and KFed and Anna Nicole Smith and all this stuff, meanwhile, very quietly, our country has been making some very serious mistakes that could be avoided if we the people, including the news media, are involved in a full and vigorous discussion of what our choices are.”

[...]

Mr. Traub said that, as he followed the ex-vice president around, the Goracle was “eating like a maniac: I watched him inhale the clam dip at a reception like a man who doesn’t know when his next meal will be coming.”

[...]

Doug Brinkley, the presidential historian, said that even though the fashion now is for fit candidates, after the Civil War, there was a series of overweight presidents. “It showed you had a zest for life,” he said. (The excess baggage may make Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson look roguish, but unfortunately, too many cheeseburgers and ice cream sundaes make Mr. Gore look puffy and waxy.) “Maybe,” Mr. Brinkley suggested, “Gore can sit in Tennessee and do it via high-definition satellite — like McKinley, just eat and sit."


I would have thought that when Shafer said her column "showcased" Gore's critique, he meant that her snide, bitchy superficial approach to politics is exactly what Gore was talking about. But he didn't. Shafer's article concentrates entirely on the mistaken idea that Gore is complaining that the media aren't covering politics enough, which is only a very small part of the argument. His main complaint is that the news media insist on being shallow, gossipy little twits like their Queen Bee, Maureen Dowd, and she has rarely "showcased" her toxic brand of political commentary more obviously than she did in that column.

Maureen Dowd says she "speaks truth to power," which she does. She tells them exactly what the puerile DC insiders really think of the people they know and cover and the country in which they live. According to the world of Modo, Democrats are all fat, gay bimbos in one way or the other and Republicans are rich, macho cartoons. (Now which of those stupid, facile stereotypes work to the advantage of those who are characterized that way and which ones work against them?)

That is what Gore is talking about -- turning political coverage into gossip columns and treating the whole universe of news as an opportunity to demonstrate how cynically superior the commentator is to the useless schlubs all over the country who actually give a damn. It isn't just on the op-ed pages or on the gasbag shows. It's obviously a social norm that filters into the news pages and affects editorial choices. Watching Modo's little cabal whisper and giggle about whether the Clintons are "doin' it" and pointing and jeering at Gore scarfing the clam dip is like being at a perpetual eighth grade slumber party with the meanest girls in the world. It makes mature adults want to reach for the bourbon and hide out in the garage.



.
|

Google
WWW Hullabaloo