Hullabaloo

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

 
Report Like It's 2002

by tristero

The headline is reassuring, if you care whether your tax dollars are being used to fund war atrocities. It says U.S. disputes 90 civilians killed in Afghan airstrike. To put it mildly, that is utterly misleading, in a way oh so reminiscent of 2002/2003. Here are the first nine paragraphs of the article:

Convincing evidence" indicates a U.S. airstrike in Afghanistan last week killed 90 civilians, including 60 children, a U.N. fact-finding human rights team said Tuesday.

The U.N. team said its findings were based on interviews with eyewitnesses.

The Afghan government, which also investigated Friday's incident, announced Sunday it had concluded that more than 90 civilians, most of them children, were killed. The U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan said 15 Afghans were wounded.

"The Afghan people and the Afghan government have lost their patience," said Humayun Hamidzada, a spokesman for Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

"We cannot see our children being killed in our villages or the killing of innocent people, and our hope and strong request is to reach a new agreement with the international community which clarifies all the conditions, so that in the future, the fight against terrorism should happen in the boundary of law, so that civilians are not affected," he said.

Kai Eide, special representative of the secretary-general for Afghanistan, released a statement saying a U.N. assistance mission team met Monday with the district governor, local elders and residents of the Shindand district of Herat province, in western Afghanistan.

"Investigations by UNAMA found convincing evidence based on the testimony of eyewitnesses and others that some 90 civilians were killed," Eide said.

Fifteen women and 15 men were among those dead, and 15 other civilians were wounded in the airstrike, the team said.

Afghan ministers on Monday demanded a review of international troops within its borders.

Then, there's a report that an unnamed military official expressed "doubt about the high death toll." Maybe it's 30, the US official asserts, without any evidence. Then:

Eide, in his statement, provided details of the results of the attack.

"The destruction from aerial bombardment was clearly evident, with some seven to eight houses having been totally destroyed, and serious damage to many others. Local residents were able to confirm the number of casualties, including names, age and gender of the victims," he said.

Eide said residents from a number of households in Nawabad village confirmed that foreign and Afghan military personnel came into the area.

"Military operations lasted several hours, during which airstrikes were called in," he said, quoting the residents.

But if you're in a hurry, all you'll see is that headline. And think there might be some doubt.

tristero 8/27/2008 02:05:00 PM |