Originalists Of The Species
by digby
Lisa aLa Figa went to some rallies in the LA area today and saw this sign:
Considering the level of historical knowledge we see on the right these days it's reasonable to assume that this is just another illiterate wingnut. But it's not. Apparently, this is a right wing slogan supporting the notion that poor people who don't pay income taxes should not be allowed to vote because they vote for government benefits. In other words, poor people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Not that this is a particularly original idea. Elites fretted about democracy from the get, worrying that the polloi would use the vote to steal the landowners' money.
In fact, these tea baggers really are "originalists." They want to go back to the colonial system:
The basic principle that governed voting in colonial America was that voters should have a "stake in society." Leading colonists associated democracy with disorder and mob rule, and believed that the vote should be restricted to those who owned property or paid taxes. Only these people, in their view, were committed members of the community and were sufficiently independent to vote. Each of the thirteen colonies required voters either to own a certain amount of land or personal property, or to pay a specified amount in taxes.
Many colonies imposed other restrictions on voting, including religious tests. Catholics were barred from voting in five colonies and Jews in four.
The right to vote varied widely in colonial America. In frontier areas, seventy to eighty percent of white men could vote. But in some cities, the percentage was just forty to fifty percent.
The American Revolution was fought in part over the issue of voting. The Revolutionaries rejected the British argument that representation in Parliament could be virtual (that is, that English members of Parliament could adequately represent the interests of the colonists). Instead, the Revolutionaries argued that government derived its legitimacy from the consent of the governed.
This made many restrictions on voting seem to be a violation of fundamental rights. During the period immediately following the Revolution, some states replaced property qualifications with taxpaying requirements. This reflected the principle that there should be "no taxation without representation." Other states allowed anyone who served in the army or militia to vote. Vermont was the first state to eliminate all property and taxpaying qualifications for voting.
So, the tea party thing isn't metaphorical; they literally want to go back to the original understanding of suffrage too.
I assume they also believes that the Second Amendment gives them the right to carry a musket.