We respectfully urge you to exercise your authority to reverse Attorney General Holder’s August 24 decision to re-open the criminal investigation of CIA interrogations that took place following the attacks of September 11.
They're not asking Obama to pardon those CIA officers under investigation, which would be a proper request of the President; they're asking Obama to spike an investigation the Attorney General has deemed necessary. They are, in short, asking for legal process to be set aside for, ultimately, a political decision.And they're making that request by appealing to an investigation conducted under a prior Attorney General--Alberto Gonzales--still (as far as we know) under investigation for politicizing DOJ.
The post-September 11 interrogations for which the Attorney General is opening an inquiry were investigated four years ago by career prosecutors.
They're further making that request by appealing to a US Attorney--Paul McNulty--also involved in that politicization.
Career prosecutors under the supervision of the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia determined that one prosecution (of a CIA contractor) was warranted.
So they pile up political interference on top of political interference. Now, these former DCIs repeat the term "career prosecutor" four times. And it may well be the case that--unlike some other cases under Alberto Gonzales--there was no interference here. But they ignore one of the precipitating causes for the investigation being reopened: The Office of Public Responsibility's finding that there was serious misconduct involved with the referrals in these cases (the DCIs say there were fewer than 20).
Read on ...