Bipolar administration-- Chris Hayes' roundtable talks about Plan B and Clinton's very excellent speech

Bipolar politics

by digby

Chris Hayes had a nice discussion this morning about the odious Plan B decision and Secretary Clinton's historic LGBT speech this past week. Worth watching the whole thing if you have the time:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



I had forgotten this, which Hayes showed in a clip on the show:

Long-awaited guidelines ordered by President Obama last year to prevent government research from being altered or suppressed for political purposes so the integrity of government scientists can be protected could be released as early as Friday.

The guidelines are nearly 11/2 years overdue. During that time, the administration has drawn criticism for its own scientific missteps.

Obama had been in office less than two months when he ordered his science advisers to draw up the guidelines. He told government researchers gathered in the White House that he wanted to protect their work from political interference.

"It's about letting scientists, like those who are here today, do their jobs free from manipulation or coercion and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient, especially when it's inconvenient," he said.


Update: Also this, an excellent piece about how clinicians see the Plan B decision:

I emailed this weekend with several experienced clinicians in this area. They report that Plan B has an award-winning easy-to-read label, that there are very few medical contraindications to this medication. One commented: “We seem to be saying that a young teen can increase her risk of becoming a parent (which entails lots of reading and complex tasks) but not read a label.”

She went on to note evidence of how poor access to care is for teens, how many teens present late for prenatal care, late for contraception following initiation of sexual relationships, and, yes, late for abortion if that is their choice. Plan B is designed for people who are motivated to prevent pregnancy, who should be supported and not hindered. This debate is especially ironic in light of evidence that teens who have had unprotected sex typically do not access emergency contraception, when these medications are free or distributed to them in advance.




.