State sabotage: overwhelming the system was part of the plan

State sabotage

by digby

One of the most effective acts of Obamacare sabotage was for so many states to  "opt out" of creating their own exchanges, thus forcing the Feds to pick up the slack. Since the federal government offered up large sums to help them set up their own, it was assumed they's be happy to create some state government jobs and allow their own people to benefit.  But no, they sent the money back.   And the result is an overwhelmed and poorly designed system that was never intended to serve so many.  Three points to the saboteurs.

Still, it's important to note that the laboratories of democracy that did their job as intended are doing better. Jonathan Cohn surveyed the available information:
Obamacare’s architects assumed that most states would opt to run their own marketplaces, with federal officials running only a few. The assumption proved wrong: Pretty much any state with a Republican governor or Republican legislative control said no, adding to the administrative burden on HHS. But 14 states plus the District of Columbia are managing their own markets. Mostly it’s places you would expect—progressive outposts like California, Washington, and New York—where Obama and his policies are most popular. But Kentucky, where a Democratic governor and group of dedicated officials have worked diligently to deliver the law’s benefits, is also on the list.

Some of these states are still having major problems: Hawaii, which relied on the same contractor as HHS, seems to be in the worst shape. But the websites in other states are now running and, while it's difficult to get a precise sense of how each one is operating, most appear to be functioning well. They may have more traditional glitches, like random error messages or delays in certain features. (California had to hold off introducing a tool that allows people to check provider networks online.) And most had trouble on the first day or two. But since that time they've been running more smoothly.

One of those states is Connecticut, where Kevin Counihan, chief executive of Connecticut’s health marketplace, told me last week that the system has been working well and consistently since Tuesday afternoon on October 1. "We were down from 12:30 until 2 that day, for a fix, but we’ve had no problems since. We are able to process applications through enrollment and we don’t have issues with wait time." 
As a result, Obamacare in these places seems to be working more or less like it's supposed to work. Consumers are getting opportunities they never had before—to shop for insurance plans, each one with clearly defined benefits that make true comparisons possible, and to receive substantial financial assistance that provides many with thousands of dollars a year in assistance. And, from the looks of things, people are taking advantage of it. The Advisory Board, which is tracking state figures, says that about 180,000 have completed applications for insurance and, of those, 50,000 have enrolled.

Those figures don't say much about whether Obamacare in these states will meet goals for enrollment. It's way, way too early to make that judgment. But the figures suggest that the technology in these places works. And people using the sites say the same thing. “The system is working well—we can’t complain,” Licelot Miguel, a navigator in New York, told Dwyer. (Miguel emphasized that she was speaking for herself, not on behalf of her organization.) The first day was tough, Miguel said: It seems some browsers weren’t working. But now the slowdowns tend to be human rather than technological, Miguel said, because people need 15 or 20 minutes to choose the right plan. “When you get through to the end, it’s like oooooh. People get excited.”
Cohn does not excuse the federal system problems by any means. In fact, he's ruthlessly critical. But in my mind, the blame for this failure lies equally with the disgusting GOP politicians who would rather see their own constituents die in the street than help make health insurance affordable and available to them. After all, according to their own philosophy the smaller scale of 50 individual states attempting a new program is automatically superior. (Indeed, the Democrats who designed the system bought that line of logic and assumed this would be a big selling point.) So they did it with the intention of making the federal system fail. That's sabotage.

Update: The government now estimates that 476,000 people have signed up through the federal and state exchanges.