The John Dean playbook
by digby
John Dean wrote an op-ed for the New York Times about Michael Cohen. He compares the two testimonies pointing out that he testified for five long days and many more people saw it but it looks as though the reaction is roughly similar to the early polling on Cohen:
Polls varied widely after my testimony. One said 50 percent of Americans believed me, 30 percent did not, and 20 percent were not sure. Another poll had 38 percent believing the president, who denied my statement, and 37 percent believing me. The instant polls on Mr. Cohen’s testimony vary by party affiliation, as was the case with my polls. But 35 percent found him credible. I believe that number will grow.
While my testimony was eventually corroborated by secret recordings of our conversations made by Mr. Nixon, before that it was other witnesses who made the difference. I was surprised by the number of people who surfaced to support my account. The same, I suspect, will happen for Michael Cohen. The Mafia’s code of omertà has no force in public service. I have heard no one other than Roger Stone say he will go to jail for Donald Trump.
Mr. Cohen should understand that if Mr. Trump is removed from office, or defeated in 2020, in part because of his testimony, he will be reminded of it for the rest of his life. He will be blamed by Republicans but appreciated by Democrats. If he achieves anything short of discovering the cure for cancer, he will always live in this pigeonhole. How do I know this? I am still dealing with it.
Just as Mr. Nixon had his admirers and apologists, so it is with Mr. Trump. Some of these people will forever be rewriting history, and they will try to rewrite it at Mr. Cohen’s expense. They will put words in his mouth that he never spoke. They will place him at events at which he wasn’t present and locations where he has never been. Some have tried rewriting my life, and they will rewrite his, too.
I am thinking of people like Mr. Stone, the longtime Trump associate who worked on the 1972 Nixon campaign and so admires the former president that he has a tattoo of the man’s likeness between his shoulder blades. Mr. Stone, whom I never met while at the White House, has been indicted as part of the inquiry by the special counsel, Robert Mueller, on charges of lying to Congress about his efforts to contact WikiLeaks during the 2016 presidential campaign.
He prides himself as a political dirty trickster, and he has never met a conspiracy theory he did not believe. Mr. Cohen can be sure that Mr. Stone will promote new conspiracy theories to defend Mr. Trump and himself, even if it means rewriting history. Presidential scandals tend to attract a remarkable number of dishonest “historians.”
There is one overarching similarity that Mr. Cohen and I share. He came to understand and reject Mr. Trump as I did Mr. Nixon.
Mr. Nixon first called on me regarding Watergate some eight months after the arrests of his re-election committee operatives at the Watergate. We had 37 conversations, and when I felt I had his confidence, I tried but failed to get him to end the cover-up. The day I told Mr. Nixon there was a cancer on his presidency was the day I met the real Nixon. I knew I had to break rank.
Mr. Cohen has likewise come to see Mr. Trump for his true nature. At the very end of his testimony before the House Oversight Committee, he sought permission to read a closing statement.
He thanked the members, and again accepted responsibility for his bad behavior. He then told the legislators, “Given my experience working for Mr. Trump, I fear that if he loses the election in 2020 that there will never be a peaceful transition of power, and this is why I agreed to appear before you today.” This was the most troubling — actually, chilling — thing he said in his five hours before the committee.
Since Mr. Cohen’s warning came in his closing words, there was no opportunity for committee members to ask follow-up questions. So I double-checked with his lawyer, Lanny Davis, if I had understood Mr. Cohen’s testimony correctly. Mr. Davis responded, “He was referring to Trump’s authoritarian mind-set, and lack of respect for democracy and democratic institutions.”
Indeed, what is most similar about my and Mr. Cohen’s testimony is that we both challenged authoritarian presidents of the United States by revealing their lies and abuses of power. Mr. Trump is the first authoritarian president since Mr. Nixon, and neither he nor his supporters will play fair. Mr. Cohen will be dealing with these people the rest of his life.
In fact, all Americans are affected by the growing authoritarianism that made Mr. Trump president. These people who facilitated his rise will remain long after Mr. Trump is gone. We need to pay more attention.
Agreed. I noted the same thing.
It's unlikely there will ever be the kind of smoking gun like the tapes that took Nixon down. That was something out of a movie. But Dean is right that there are other witnesses and there are documents to back up Cohen's testimony. And while there are many similarities between this scandal and Watergate, the sheer number of felonies Trump is suspected of committing as a businessman, his total incompetence as president and the fact that he may have literally betrayed the nation puts him in a much grander category of political than Nixon. Nixon was much smarter and even more malevolent in some ways but he understood the limits of his power in a way that Trump doesn't. I think Trump is more dangerous.
I wrote about the Cohen - John Dean thing last summer:
Is Michael Cohen ready for the John Dean role: A hero who saves America from Donald Trump?
If there's one thing that must give a shady businessman or corrupt politician sleepless nights it's the knowledge that his attorney is about to cooperate with federal prosecutors in a case against him. The lawyer is the one person, with the exception of one's spouse (and maybe not even then) entrusted with their most nefarious secrets. If that lawyer is also his self-described "fixer" already known to pay hush money and personally threaten people on his behalf well, let's just say sleepless nights aren't the half of it.
Back in April of 1973, the very shady President of the United States, Richard Nixon, woke up one morning to learn that his former White House counsel, John Dean, had been cooperating with federal prosecutors who were investigating his administration's involvement in the break-in of the Democratic National Committee the previous previous spring. And he had good reason to be sweating bullets about that since Dean had been instrumental in the cover-up the president had personally directed.
After months of a slow news drip implicating various Nixon associates in slush funds and dirty tricks the scandal had reached the oval office.The FBI director had resigned over having destroyed evidence, Nixon had fired Dean and he had been forced to ask his most trusted henchmen H.R. Haldeman and John Erlichman to resign. He knew that Dean wanted to cooperate with the investigation so it wasn't a huge surprise to learn that he was telling all but it still had to be a very bad day.
Dean turned out to be an incredibly effective witness. He had tried to get documentary evidence out of the White House to back up his story but had been unable to do it. However he had an extremely sharp memory for detail and unlike today where the congress is actually participating in the cover up, there were public hearings and Dean's testimony was dramatic and unforgettable. He told the story of how he had participated in White House efforts to hide its involvement in various crimes and how he went to the president and famously told him that there was a "cancer on the presidency." When it was later revealed that the White House had taped the president's conversations, Dean's recollections were proven to be nearly word for word.
I would never compare John Dean to Donald Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen in terms of legal skill or intellect. But it's interesting that here we are 45 years later and once again we see the president's lawyer as a possible star witness against him. Cohen gave an interview to ABC news' George Stephanopoulos over the week-end in which he strongly implied that he was prepared to cooperate with prosecutors if he is, as expected, indicted on federal charges.
Obviously, the situation is different in dozens of ways, not the least of which is that Cohen, unlike Dean, was the president's personal and business attorney not the White House counsel. And the issues which may involve the president are as likely to pertain to personal business as they are to the investigation into the presidential campaign. But there is no doubt that Cohen, like Dean, was involved in a cover-up. In Cohen's case it has to do with paying hush money to porn actresses and playmates. And there is also suspicion that he was involved in covering up some aspects of Russian collusion. He does not appear to be willing to take the fall for any of it.
Recall that two weeks ago, ABC's Stephanopoulos broke the story that Cohen was changing lawyers and follow up reporting by others indicated that there were some complications with the payment of legal fees, which had been handled at least in part by the Trump organization. It was suspected that Trump's public distancing from his former lawyer and his unwillingness to part with a dollar was showing Cohen that he was on his own. Now Stephanopoulos gets another scoop, this time an interview in which Cohen makes it very, very clear that he is no longer Trump's loyal sycophant.
Most of the pundits and analysts assume that Cohen was making a Hail Mary pass at Trump to issue him a pardon before he gets indicted and spills everything to the prosecutors.And that's certainly possible. In the interview he was asked whether he could say that Trump told him to pay off Stormy Daniels and whether Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting with the Russian lawyers and he said that he could not answer on the advice of his attorney which certainly does imply that the answer to both of those questions is yes. And Trump would know the answer was yes. If he's inclined to issue a pardon, Cohen is saying that he'd better do it soon.
But keep in mind that this is Trumpworld we're talking about and among those people you really don't exist unless you're on TV. I suspect that this has much more to do with the fact that Michael Cohen is trying to figure out how he can possibly parlay this situation into a new career in media once this mess is over. And there's only one way for him to do that: take the John Dean route and become the man who saved America from Donald Trump. After all, Dean lost his law license and did four months in jail but he is now considered a hero and a national icon. It's not a bad model.
This idea isn't coming out of thin air. Emily Jane Fox of Vanity Fair reports that Cohen has finally accepted that Trump never had any loyalty to him and that he's on his own. Friends are telling Cohen, Fox writes, that he could change the course of history, sending messages like this: “Please let him know that he could go down in history as the man that saved this country. I think his family would be so proud of him. Even people like me that were disgusted with the things we heard on those audio recordings, would totally forgive him.” She also reports that Cohen has been planning a big media push for some time -- this is just the beginning.
That's heady stuff for anyone but particularly someone who is possibly facing years in prison or a presidential pardon that will still leave him broke and without a future. This could be a way for him to become as big a star as Donald Trump. Nothing would be a sweeter revenge.
digby 7/03/2018 10:30:00 AM
