HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Saturday, July 17, 2010

 
Forced Pregnancy For Sick People

by digby


There is a lot of legitimate outrage in the pro-choice community over the administration's recent statement that the new high risk pools won't allow women with pre-existing conditions to access abortion overage. Evidently, the Nelson amendment wasn't restrictive enough, so they agreed to enact Stupak for the sickest, most vulnerable women out there. It was sadly predictable, considering the sturm and drang during the waning days of the health care debate, but it's still jarring to see just how cowardly the Democrats are these days on this issue.

Conservative epistemic relativism defines this latest skirmish in the abortion wars. You see, they are working themselves into a frenzy over this, which might strike you as odd since the rules for the high risk pools didn't diverge from the overall health care bill. But the forced pregnancy forces went crazy with misinformation --- and the administration backed down in the face of it.

Dana Goldstein explains what happened:

...the new abortion ban is not required by either the health-care reform bill or the president’s March executive order, which promised that no federal funds would be spent on abortions in the health insurance exchanges that launch in 2014. That order stopped short of banning abortion coverage, instead adopting Sen. Ben Nelson’s proposal for a dual accounting system in which federal dollars cannot be used to fund abortion but consumers’ private insurance co-pays and deductibles can. The order did not mention the pre-existing condition insurance plan at all.

The controversy began Tuesday, when the conservative National Right to Life Committee released a statement claiming that Pennsylvania’s version of the pre-existing condition insurance program would use federal dollars to fund abortion coverage. As other social conservative groups, such as the Family Research Council, piled on, a key fact was obscured: Customers in these new high-risk insurance pools are expected to pay up to $600 monthly out of pocket for the coverage, which will be provided by private insurance companies.

In other words, though the federal government subsidized the coverage, there is no reason why abortions could not be paid for by private monies, under the very dual-accounting structure set-up by the president’s executive order.

But instead of clarifying that point, the Department of Health and Human Services responded by declaring, “Abortions will not be covered in the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan except in the cases of rape or incest, or where the life of the woman would be endangered.”


This was a perfect "Nelson" example. Women with pre-existing conditions would be allowed to get insurance coverage from a pool of private insurers, some of which could be subsidized by the government. Abortion coverage would not be included in these policies, but a woman who wanted to purchase that coverage could do so by buying a separate rider that only covers abortion and pay for it separately so good Christian money would never have to touch it. That was the deal, and a raw deal it was. Women have a constitutional right to control their own reproductive lives and there is no reason that it shouldn't be a standard part of any insurance policy.

However, Nelson was the compromise and it is the law: women who buy policies under the auspices of the health care exchanges will be allowed to buy abortion coverage with their own money, and there's no reason the high risk pools should be governed by the (equally inhumane and stupid) Federal Employees Health Plan, something that was never even discussed as far as I know. Indeed, it's a much bigger problem for these people because they literally have no choice --- they are already sick and can't get any insurance at all at the moment. Slut shaming women with a serious disease is even more immoral than usual --- but that never stopped a "pro-life" advocate from making a cheap political point.

One of the reasons that pro-choice advocates fought Nelson and Stupak so hard was because we knew it was moving the goalposts and would never be enough for the forced pregnancy zealots. And they have just demonstrated in living color that the facts and the Nelson amendment process are not going to matter. When the exchanges come on line and it turns out that some insurer is offering coverage for abortion, they will simply start screaming at the top of their lungs that their tax dollars are funding abortion and the insurers will stop offering it. If they don't, the insurance executives will find themselves picketed with pictures of bloody fetuses and eventually some nutcase will put the their picture on a web site and somebody will get shot. I think everybody understands the scenario by now. It's called terrorism, and it's very effective.

Corporations do not fight for causes and they won't endanger their bottom lines. They will throw up their hands and surrender without firing a shot. (The Obama HHS just set the example, after all.) Within a short time, there will be no more insurance coverage for abortion in America. It was baked into this Rube Goldberg health care bill from the minute the Stupak forces raised a fuss.(And that's assuming the Republicans don't take the majority --- they would outlaw abortion coverage in any insurance exchange immediately, which I would like to assume president Obama would veto. Under a GOP president, they'll definitely pass it.)

Interestingly, Stupak really does seem to have learned a lesson about his fanatical allies in the forced pregnancy camp. Here's his statement:

“This is the latest example of some right to life groups politicizing life issues in an effort to undermine health care reform. The President’s Executive Order makes clear that federal funds may not be used for abortion under the Affordable Care Act – including the pre-existing condition insurance pools currently being implemented in Pennsylvania and states across the country. In accordance with the Executive Order, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has directed states that federal funds provided under health care reform may not be used to fund abortion. HHS has reiterated this policy in response to the current accusations from the National Right to Life Committee. While these recycled scare tactics may make for good headlines, we should not lose sight of the fact that tens of thousands of individuals across the nation who have been denied coverage by health insurance companies due to pre-existing conditions will for the first time have access to affordable health insurance. We need to take a whole life approach to health care which looks out for those who are out of the womb as well as those in the womb.”


Sounds like somebody's had a wake-up call that his "pro-life" friends are all lying fanatics. Too bad it's too late.


.