HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Thursday, January 23, 2014

 
Justice is in the eye of Eric Holder

by digby

Edward Snowden took questions earlier today. Here's a sample of his traitorous thinking:
Q: What (in your opinion) is the appropriate extent of US national security apparatus? Surely some spying is needed?

SNOWDEN: Not all spying is bad. The biggest problem we face right now is the new technique of indiscriminate mass surveillance, where governments are seizing billions and billions and billions of innocents’ communication every single day. This is done not because it’s necessary — after all, these programs are unprecedented in US history, and were begun in response to a threat that kills fewer Americans every year than bathtub falls and police officers — but because new technologies make it easy and cheap.

I think a person should be able to dial a number, make a purchase, send an SMS, write an email, or visit a website without having to think about what it’s going to look like on their permanent record. Particularly when we now have courts, reports from the federal government, and even statements from Congress making it clear these programs haven’t made us any more safe, we need to push back.

This is a global problem, and America needs to take the lead in fixing it. If our government decides our Constitution’s 4th Amendment prohibition against unreasonable seizures no longer applies simply because that’s a more efficient means of snooping, we’re setting a precedent that immunizes the government of every two-bit dictator to perform the same kind of indiscriminate, dragnet surveillance of entire populations that the NSA is doing.

It’s not good for our country, it’s not good for the world, and I wasn’t going to stand by and watch it happen, no matter how much it cost me. The NSA and the rest of the US Intelligence Community is exceptionally well positioned to meet our intelligence requirements through targeted surveillance — the same way we’ve always done it — without resorting to the mass surveillance of entire populations.

When we’re sophisticated enough to be able to break into any device in the world we want to (up to and including Angela Merkel’s phone, if reports are to be believed), there’s no excuse to wasting our time collecting the call records of grandmothers in Missouri.
Way to shred the constitution there, Trotsky.

The good news is that Attorney General Eric Holder reiterated today that just because we are now having this overdue and necessary reevaluation of our secret surveillance programs as a result of Snowden's revelations, it does not mean he should not be held criminally liable. After all, what would happen if people could just break the law and violate the constitution with impunity?

I guess reporters had no time to follow up with the Attorney General about why he feels so adamant about punishment of this particular "crime" when the wealthy criminals who crashed the global financial system are still free and living like kings and the sadists who violated the law and the constitution with torture and indefinite detention are walking around with impunity.

If I recall correctly, the original rationale for not pursuing the torturers was this:
"This is a time for reflection, not retribution. I respect the strong views and emotions that these issues evoke. We have been through a dark and painful chapter in our history. But at a time of great challenges and disturbing disunity, nothing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past."
And the financial markets are very fragile creatures, so holding our Master of the Universe liable for their crimes would be unwise:
According to three people briefed at the time about the meeting, Mr. Geithner expressed concern about the fragility of the financial system. His worry, according to these people, sprang from a desire to calm markets, a goal that could be complicated by a hard-charging attorney general.

Several years after the financial crisis, which was caused in large part by reckless lending and excessive risk taking by major financial institutions, no senior executives have been charged or imprisoned, and a collective government effort has not emerged. This stands in stark contrast to the failure of many savings and loan institutions in the late 1980s. In the wake of that debacle, special government task forces referred 1,100 cases to prosecutors, resulting in more than 800 bank officials going to jail. Among the best-known: Charles H. Keating Jr., of Lincoln Savings and Loan in Arizona, and David Paul, of Centrust Bank in Florida.
It's interesting how forgiving government officials can be when it suits them, isn't it?

In the case of torture, the government decided they needed to balance out the obvious immorality and unconstitutionality of torture with the morale of the operatives who carried it out and the "good faith" of the sadists who designed the policy and legalized it in secret. The case of the Masters of the Universe was "complicated" and might hinder the recovery to hold any of the big players responsible for the widespread misery they caused. The greater good demanded that we not look in the rearview mirror.

But for some reason, despite the fact that everyone from the president on down acknowledges that the revelations about the NSA programs have spurred a vital conversation and much needed reforms, there can be no thought of treating Snowden like a whistleblower instead of a criminal. But then, he didn't torture anyone or order the torture of anyone and he didn't bring down the global financial system and destroy the economic security of millions of people. In fact, nobody can point to anything but "embarrassment" as the damage his leaks have caused.

So I guess we know now where they draw the line. Torture, indefinite imprisonment and economic chaos are one thing. But having to put up with Angela Merkel's temper will not stand. Being forced to admit that these programs have gotten out of hand is humiliating for an exceptional country like ours.  Having a bright light shining on extremely expensive secret government activity that doesn't seem to be producing any results is mortifying, especially to those who have been charge with overseeing these programs and obviously haven't got a clue. The world thinks we're perfect and any evidence to the contrary will irreparably weaken us.

But the opposite is true. Nobody thinks we're perfect. And a hugely powerful nation like the United States is far stronger if it is able to face its mistakes, punish those who perpetrate them and forgive those who reveal them. This mishmash of injustice, hypocrisy, favoritism and, frankly, rank immorality we've seen escalating since 9/11 is weakening us far more than any power point chart Edward Snowden leaked to the newspapers.



Update: here's another example of Snowden's irrational point of view:

“Intelligence agencies do have a role to play, and the people at the working level at the NSA, CIA, or any other member of the IC are not out to get you. They’re good people trying to do the right thing, and I can tell you from personal experience that they were worried about the same things I was.

The people you need to watch out for are the unaccountable senior officials authorizing these unconstitutional programs, and unreliable mechanisms like the secret FISA court, a rubber-stamp authority that approves 99.97% of government requests (which denied only 11 requests out of 33,900 in 33 years). They’re the ones that get us into trouble with the Constitution by letting us go too far.”

Update II: According to this, Holder indicated today that he might consider a plea deal of some sort. Very interesting. Perhaps the fact that Snowden is exiled while John Yoo roams free teaching his law students that torture is legal feels a bit uncomfortable.


.