Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

Facebook: Digby Parton

@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)

thedigbyblog at gmail
satniteflix at gmail
publius.gaius at gmail
tpostsully at gmail
Spockosbrain at gmail
Richardein at me.com


Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic

Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Saturday, September 12, 2015


Rolling back the Renaissance

by Tom Sullivan

"Gullibility is the new civic duty," Charlie Pierce wrote in describing the Carly Fiorina SuperPAC, Carly For America. The Federal Election Commission rule against coordination between SuperPACs and campaigns they support is one "everybody knows but to which very few people pay attention." It may look like a campaign, act like a campaign, and raise money like a campaign, but it's not:

At a typ­ic­al Fior­ina cam­paign stop, a CARLY For Amer­ica staffer was sta­tioned at a table out­side of the event space to sign up at­tendees for the su­per PAC’s email list. An­oth­er staffer handed out CARLY For Amer­ica stick­ers to at­tendees as they ar­rived. When Fior­ina and her staff entered the event, they were usu­ally met by a room covered in red “CARLY” signs and tables covered in pro-Fior­ina lit­er­at­ure, all pro­duced by CARLY For Amer­ica.

If a reg­u­lar voter at­ten­ded every cam­paign stop and handed out fly­ers telling someone to vote for that can­did­ate, the cost of print­ing would count as an in-kind ex­pendit­ure. Both Fior­ina’s cam­paign and CARLY For Amer­ica main­tain that the work be­ing done by the su­per PAC does not con­sti­tute an in-kind con­tri­bu­tion to the cam­paign, but an in­de­pend­ent ex­pendit­ure. But elec­tion-law ex­perts say that, in ef­fect, the su­per PAC is provid­ing a ser­vice by staff­ing the events.

But evidence is so Enlightenment, you know? It is the enemy of gullibility. Faith, ideology? Those are now the coin of the realm. Mike Huckabee can claim that "the Dred Scott decision of 1857 still remains to this day the law of the land, which says that black people aren’t fully human,” in defending Kim Davis' claims of religious persecution. He can ignore the 14th Amendment. It just muddies the ideological waters. Evidence is inconvenient like that. If might makes right, so does faith ... in whatever.

In spite of “evidence-based policymaking” finding at least rhetorical bipartisan support in Washington, Politico reports there is "a quiet war on the idea" in Washington. In climate science, gun violence, violent crime, health care, and education research, Congress is either blocking funding or cutting it. Even the American Enterprise Institute is alarmed by proposed cuts to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), writes Harry Stein:

The decision by Congress to weaken its own ability to gather and process evidence might be the most troubling example of how Congress has lost interest in applying evidence to inform public policy. These budget cuts undermine vital nonpartisan institutions within the legislative branch, including the policy experts at the Congressional Research Service and the investigators at the Government Accountability Office. These institutions are critical sources for Congress to get credible research and evaluation of public policy from experts who are independent from the executive branch. Budget cuts also make it harder for members and committees of Congress to hire and retain their own top-notch policy staff to understand complex issues, which makes legislators more dependent on expertise from lobbyists and interest groups.

There you are. Because dependency on the government is bad for you. Government dependency on lobbyists is good for America. They prefer it that way.

The irony about evidence falling on hard times is that when I arrived here in the 1990s, the New Age was in full flower-power. As Larry Massett observed in “A Night on Mt. Shasta” (recorded during the Harmonic Convergence), "I met a lot of people I liked and almost no one I believed." People following their spiritual journeys seemed alienated by modernity, and suckers for whatever snake oil came peddled by people who seemed genuine enough.

Twenty years later, it is time again. Donald Trump, a cross between P.T. Barnum and Minnesota Fats, is leading the Republican field for president because he seems genuine. Among Democrats, Joe Biden is the genuine non-candidate:

To be genuine would be a great strength at a time when Hillary Clinton seems all the more contrived for trying to be spontaneous and people are responding to Donald Trump no matter what he says simply because he seems to be saying what he really thinks at that moment.

In the past, the knock on Biden has been that he utters whatever pops into his brain. Trump has made this into a big positive and that could make it the same for Biden.

True, but not particularly comforting. A few years ago, I ran a series at Scrutiny Hooligans called Unmaking the American Century. I might have to re-title it. A large swath of America seems eager to roll things back further still. Past the Enlightenment. Past the Renaissance.

Welcome back, Middle Ages. They missed you.