Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

Facebook: Digby Parton

@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)

thedigbyblog at gmail
satniteflix at gmail
publius.gaius at gmail
tpostsully at gmail
Spockosbrain at gmail
Richardein at me.com


Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic

Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Thursday, July 07, 2016

Trump's campaign casino

by digby

The Trump campaign finally had some positive news to release yesterday. They have apparently been able to raise over 50 million in the month of June for the presidential campaign. Unfortunately, the press release is as clear as mud and nobody knows exactly when and how the money was allegedly raised or whether the campaign has cash on hand or how much was raised from big and small donors. TPM reported:
"The way the release is written makes it difficult to determine precisely how much Trump raised and for which committees and during which time period," Rick Hasen, an election law expert and professor at the University of California at Irvine School of Law, told TPM. "So, we’ll have to wait for the official FEC report before we know for sure what the money figures actually look like."
There was also no word on how many of the foreign politicians they illegally solicited came through for them but they are still working hard to get them to donate. This letter went out yesterday to a Scottish MP:

However, he had to hope that anyone who gave money didn't listen to Hillary Clinton's speech in Atlantic City yesterday or they might regret their "investment" the same way virtually everyone who has ever done business with him regrets theirs. (I wrote about his Atlantic City debacle for Salon a while back.) Clinton laid out the whole story along with the other exposes that have been done on his failed  projects in Florida and Baja California as well as scams like Trump University. Let's just say his record is nothing to brag about. 

Marty Rosenberg, one of Trump's many victims spoke as well:
Over a quarter of a century ago– Over a quarter of a century ago, I was one of the contractors participating in building the Taj Mahal. It was this time that Donald Trump made a promise to me, my family, and to the people of Atlantic City.  If you do a good job– if you do a good job, in a timely manner, you will be paid an agreed upon, agreement. This promise went unfulfilled. Trump’s actions caused great financial burdens to most of us. Some lost their businesses, some went through a bankruptcy, all suffered emotionally. All the while, Mr. Trump went about his extravagant lifestyle, never giving any of us a second thought. I am here today to help ensure that this sort of manipulation of people by Trump will not continue on a national stage.
If his recent FEC Reports are to be believed, he's running his campaign in similar fashion. The May report showed that just as he always paid himself first in his failed businesses, he is also funneling millions from his campaign back into his own companies and family enterprises. He paid himself 350k or the use of his personal jet and  125k for Trump restaurants. 65k went for golf and 4k to his son's wine company. His largest single expenditure for staging went to his own resort Mar-a Lago. He also paid for his family's travel expenses, which seems unnecessary since they are all multi-millionaires.

The report had a number of very odd expenditures including one to an entity called "Draper-Sterling" an obvious reference to the TV show "Madmen." It was traced to a residence in New Hampshire owned by someone peripherally associated with some political consulting and a group called Patriots for America which was involved with a Missouri Senate race. (You can read about the whole strange story at Think Progress.)

And yesterday CNBC reported that a close look at Trump's FEC filings show that his campaign has been sloppy at best and fraudulent at worst in its payments to its own staff:
A series of filing anomalies point to a Donald Trump camp that is either unaware of campaign finance law, or is actively funneling donors' cash to insiders, according to several experts interviewed by CNBC. 
These "red flags," as one expert deemed them, include a total lack of disclosure on which vendors staffers for the presumptive Republican nominee are paying, an "unusual" six-figure payout to campaign staff for nontaxable expenses and what appeared to be double reimbursements for some employees' expenses.
If he's having his staff pad their expense reports and phony up vendor payments he is as low rent and cheap as it gets. If he didn't know about it then his reputation as a genius businessman who will snap the federal budget into shape is, shall we say, overstated. And it's entirely possible that it's downright criminal:
The Trump camp's handling of so-called contribution refunds also sparked questions. All Trump staffers who logged "in-kind" purchases were both reimbursed for those costs and also appeared to receive a second payment in the form of a campaign contribution refund. 
In addition to representing a second payment, this practice raises questions because contribution refunds are normally for donors who exceed their legally defined limits, not paid staffers, multiple experts told CNBC... 
Importantly, Gross said, this method of payment "has the net effect of giving the appearance that the campaign is receiving more donations than it is even though the cash on hand works out in the final analysis. 
The CNBC report is very thorough, looking at individual line items which show some very dicey entries that certainly appear to be in keeping with his longstanding practice of taking expenses off the top of all his losing enterprises before they crash and burn. Or it may just be that neither Trump or anyone who works for him has the slightest idea what they are doing.

CNBC audited the campaign reports before it had much money. If it's true that they've collected somewhere between 25 and 50 million for the campaign in the last month then the real grift is just about to kick in.  Remember, Trump told Fortune magazine back in 2000, "it's very possible that I could be the first presidential candidate to run and make money on it."  It's not as if he didn't warn anyone.