There is Only One Candidate Part Three
by tristero
Go out and pick up a hard copy of the NY Times. The online edition is different, you need the full effect of actual hard print here. I'll wait.
Got it? Great! Now look on the front page. There's a headline with the word "Trump" in it above the fold. Now, go through section A (the main news section of the paper). The word "Trump" is on a smaller headline in the news summary on page 2.
Keep going. Page 10, "Obama" gets a headline. Page 16, again there's a "Trump" in the headline.
Page 18, again, two headlines above the fold with the word"Trump."
Page 25, an above the fold headline with the word "Trump."
Now, the editorial pages.
"Trump" is in the headline of the lead editorial on page 26. "Donald Trump" is in the headline of Tom Friedman's editorial on page 27. Both above the fold, by the way. And that's the front section of the paper of record.
Not a single headline mention of any rival candidate.
This regularly goes on day after day after day everywhere, in every media outlet in this country. All Trump, all the trumping time. There is no one else running for president.*
Whoops! Wait-a-minute, wait-a-minute... Flip back. On the op-ed page (nearly missed it!) there's an editorial entitled "My Plan For Helping America's Poor" with a byline by - wow, I can't believe it, they're letting her publish something?- Hillary Clinton!!! Let's look!!!!
Oh, dear... Oh, no. Oh.
It's unreadable, completely unreadable. Clinton takes 7 long and statistic-bloated paragraphs to tell us that (who knew?) she thinks it's bad that some American children are growing up in poverty.
And then her plan! A... a what? A 10-20-30 plan? What the hell is that? And who is Jim Clyburn? Is he running for president, too? Clinton finally gets her name (albeit in tiny type) mentioned above the fold and this is what we get, the best cure for insomnia ever, guaranteed?
We are doomed.
------
*Because who, including Times readers, has time to read more than one or two articles beyond the headlines, except for politics junkies?