HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Thursday, November 10, 2016

 
They created him now they're normalizing him

by digby



















I wrote about the press giving Trump a clean slate today for Salon:


Last spring when Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were sewing up their parties' respective nominations, I wrote about a phenomenon that I could see was going to be a problem going forward: the media's need for "balance" making them normalize Trump and demonize Clinton. The contours of the coming general election were starting to form and what I saw wasn't healthy. Over time it became downright toxic and the poison still infects our politics now that the election has been decided.

Throughout the primaries Clinton's opponent Senator Bernie Sanders had declined to attack her about "her damn emails" and he was right to do so. The "email scandal" is a spurious charge that by having a private server she was guilty of a federal crime which is ridiculous. That belief spawned the execrable chants at Trump rallies of "lock her up" and "Hillary for Prison" and this became Trump's primary attack against her. It was a very serious charge fraught with baggage that went back more than 20 years when the press demonized her as a "congenital liar" and a criminal (neither of which were true then either.)

Clinton, meanwhile, was trying to hit a moving target, a man who is thoroughly immoral and corrupt in every way, crudely insulting everyone except his loyal followers until it all seemed to merge into a cartoon caricature that his voters didn't take seriously. His "policy" pronouncements from building a wall to banning Muslims to torturing terrorist suspects and killing their families were cheered on wildly by his fans and reported dutifully in the press as if he were a normal politician offering up his views on a highway bill. His myriad business failures were discussed but never put into the context of politics. His plans to keep his businesses going after the election wasn't questioned.  His mistreatment of women was covered extensively and then dropped.

Month after month, Clinton was hammered in the press over the arcane email story with new "tranches" being continuously released under the Freedom of Information Act. Then Wikileaks began dumping the hacked, uncurated private correspondence from her staff, each new group creating headlines but revealing nothing criminal or even unethical.  It was an a relentless drumbeat that ceased to have any specific meaning early on and instead became a symbol of Clinton's dishonesty, untrustworthiness and finally, her criminality.

The Gallup poll asked people this fall what were they were hearing about the two candidates:



As you can see, people had heard a whole lot about Clinton's emails and it certainly wasn't in a positive context. Trump, on other hand was associated with a bunch of different ideas that didn't add up to much.

This was not because the media didn't report all the negative Trump stories. It's that they didn't break through in any cohesive way while Clinton's were highly focused on one issue that served as a proxy for her allegedly dishonest character. When FBi director James Comey dropped his email bombshell in the last week of the campaign the news media went wall to wall on the story, despite the fact that it was no more of a criminal matter than it had been before. The NY Times ran their front page with screaming headlines two days in a row.

And it made a difference. As Matthew Yglesias concludes in this interesting article for Vox:
Analysis of Trump’s victory will naturally tend to focus on the broad structural forces that drove his rise. But elections are close-run things. The difference between a narrow win in Florida and a narrow loss in Florida is just a few thousand votes. The typical Trump supporter was drawn to him out of either baseline partisanship or attraction to the peculiarities of his message. But the marginal Trump supporter is the reason he won. And that supporter was very likely influenced by the overwhelming media focus on the email matter.
Clinton won the popular vote but she lost the electoral college by very small margins in a number of states. There is little doubt that the email story contributed to Hillary Clinton's defeat and as Yglesias says, it "is and always was overhyped bullshit."

One might have hoped that the fact this absurd pursuit of a non-story may have changed the course of history (and not in a good way) that the media would do some soul searching about how they covered an election between a mainstream qualified woman and an unfit confidence man. But if the first 24 hours of coverage are any example, it's unlikely.  For example, Maeve Reston of CNN tweeted this:




It's not that they didn't vet Trump. It's that they vetted him badly, in a way that people couldn't understand. And where CNN and the other networks are concerned, the hours and hours of free airtime, the bending of the rules for him, the normalizing of his outrageous campaign rhetoric, which the network honchos admitted was great for ratings, certainly adds up to special treatment.

But if we thought they had "normalized" Trump before, it was nothing to what's happening now. They assume that Donald Trump has "pivoted", shorthand for their ongoing assumption that at some point Trump would drop the cretinous imbecile act he uses to entertain the rubes and morph into the intelligent, thoughtful businessman he really is.  This anticipation of the pivot was a regular feature of the campaign which obviously never actually happened --- or ever will. Trump is Trump.

Nonetheless, the usual panels have been convened and the analysis of the election has gelled into an anodyne "change" message in which "the people" are just tired of the status quo and voted out the party in power.  The discussion is all about how President-elect Trump and the Democrats will have to reach out and bring the nation together.  The odious campaign he just ran to get to the White House, the ugliness he exposed in our body politic, has been disappeared. Donald Trump has been given a clean slate. It's like it never happened.

The good news is that until presumptive Attorney General Rudy Giuliani brings Trump's promised indictment against Hillary Clinton we won't have to hear about the emails. The only time they came up yesterday was when someone actually asked if President Obama planned to give her a presidential pardon before he leaves office. She's committed no crime and yet may face some sort of show trial to satisfy the slavering Trump voters still eager to see her punished, so the White House was non-committal.  The media's normalization of Donald Trump is complete. The demonization of Hillary Clinton continues.