Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

Facebook: Digby Parton

@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)

thedigbyblog at gmail
satniteflix at gmail
publius.gaius at gmail
tpostsully at gmail
Spockosbrain at gmail
Richardein at me.com


Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic

Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Wednesday, March 15, 2017

About that tax return

by digby

Why was Trump hawking steaks in 2007 if he was so damned rich?

I'm of the opinion that it's an unalloyed good thing to focus on Trump's finances no matter what it shows. And that's because it leads to stories like this from Michael Daly at the Daily Beast:
Were he to release just one personal tax form, President Trump would no doubt have chosen the 2-page summary from 2005, the very one that journalist David Cay Johnston revealed on the Rachel Maddow Show Tuesday night.

The 1995 return The New York Times revealed last year showed Trump reporting a $916 million loss enabling him to pay no federal income taxes at all that year and perhaps for years to come.

The 2005 return shows him actually earning $150 million and paying $38 million in taxes. Those numbers make Trump look like he really is a great businessman, with big bucks to back up the bluster.
If all his returns showed such numbers, Trump might have just gone ahead and released them during the campaign instead of inventing a series of excuses for why we could not do so.

But if he had released the 2005 return, he would have been expected to release the 2006 return, in which he likely listed the charitable donation of 436 acres from a failed golf course venture to New York State as a park. He proclaimed at the time of the donation that the land was worth $100 million. That is around $85 million more than what Westchester County officials peg as its actual value at the time.

And who knows what the other returns show?

Even in 2005, the full return would have details beyond the immediate income and tax numbers that Trump would no doubt just as soon keep private.

The rest of the filing would show that the 2005 windfall was the result of a deal made not by him, but by Chinese partners who had rescued him from a financial implosion a decade before and then parlayed the investment into a huge score.

Not only did Trump play no part in the best deal of his career, he actually fought it. He took his partners to court even as they proceeded to shelter the huge profit by making him an unwilling 30 per cent stakeholder in the purchase of two office buildings – one in Manhattan, the other in San Francisco — that remain his most profitable properties.

The subsequent returns would show that the two biggest moneymakers in the Trump empire are towers that he tried not to buy and do not bear his name. He gets only licensing and management fees from most of the towers emblazoned with TRUMP.

The big loss on the 1995 return testifies to Trump’s financial condition in 1994, when he was saved from ruin by a consortium of Chinese billionaires. They included Vincent Lo, who had become known as the Chinese Donald Trump due to his extravagant lifestyle and such tabloid adventures as dumping his first wife to take up with a beauty-pageant queen.

One difference was that Lo actually raked in big money. Trump was so eager to make a deal with Lo and his pals that he dispensed with his usual practice of negotiating on his home turf and flew to Hong Kong, where he made a fumbling attempt at using chopsticks at a banquet and insisted somebody else get the honor of starting on a HUGE fish that still had the head attached.

The Chinese agreed to assume the crushing debt on a big parcel of land that Trump had acquired on Manhattan’s West Side with the avowed aim of building Television City, home of NBC and the world’s tallest building. Trump was allowed to retain 30 per cent of the parcel and plans downsized to a row of luxury apartment buildings known as Trump Place. That was 30 per cent more than he otherwise would have kept, but not so much that his partners felt they had to include him when they moved to sell the tract.
Trump went litigiously ballistic upon learning that a property bearing his name had been sold without so much as consulting him. He called it a “very bad and destructive” deal, and filed a lawsuit insisting he could have made a much better one, charging his partners with everything from fraud to tax evasion to taking kickbacks.

The suit was tossed, which proved to be an unlikely Trump victory. He retained his 30 per cent share of the two buildings — 1290 Sixth Avenue in Manhattan and 555 California Street in San Francisco – and came to understand what a good deal the Chinese had made. He declined to sell his share when the Chinese peddled their 70 per cent interest to Vornado Realty Trust for $2.6 billion in 2007.  Trump has continued to earn millions a year from the two properties, at least $340 million so far, without counting some $450 million in equity.
His senior partner in the properties, Vornado, is run by Steve Roth, who was in attendance at Trump headquarters on victory night. Trump gave Roth a shout-out from the stage and has since appointed him and another billionaire real estate developer, Richard LeFrak, to head a White House council tasked with monitoring $1 trillion in spending on infrastructure.

In that role, Roth attended a “strategic affairs lunch” at the White House last week. Roth’s other business in Washington, D.C. reportedly includes a bid on a $2 billion FBI headquarters outside the city, a project that is stalled appropriations-wise, perhaps in part because  it has been pushed by FBI Director James Comey. The chosen developer will get the rights to the site of the present headquarters, which is just up Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House and across from Trump’s newest hotel. The Washington Post has called the property “a once in a generation development opportunity.” Vornado is already said to be one of the U.S. government's biggest landlords.

Vornado has also had business dealings with the real estate company owned by the family of Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Vornado bought a 49.5% of a Kushner building in 2011. The Kushners had purchased the building at 666 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan for $1.8 billion on Jared’s birthday in 2007. The Kushners had until then been known as New Jersey real estate guys, just as the Trumps had been known as outer-borough real estate guys before the construction of Trump Tower.

Vornado now stands to make a huge profit when it is bought out as part of a partnership deal that the Kushners are reportedly making with Anbang, a Chinese insurance company with extensive links to that county’s leadership. Anbang recently purchased the Waldorf Astoria Hotel, where its chairman, Wu Xiaohui, met with Jared Kushner in November. The champagne that was served is said to go for $2,100 a bottle.

As reported in various news outlets, further financing for the deal between the Kushners and Anbang would be provided by the EB5 visa program, where foreign investors who put up $500,000 or more are granted residency with no vetting. The Kushners used the EB5 program to finance Trump Plaza Residence in Jersey City, a Trump project in licensed name only.

Meanwhile, Vornado computes each year the net profits from the two high profit buildings that do not bear the Trump name. The 30 per cent share is then paid to Trump and no doubt entered on his tax return as further proof that his best deal was one that he sought to scuttle after it was made by the Chinese Donald Trump and his fellow big time Chinese investors.

That was the deal in 2005, the year his tax return made it look like he was a great businessman and Trump was more than just a name. The takeaway numbers could almost make you think there was some reality to the reality TV show The Apprentice.

It's nice to see that instead of pooh-poohing Maddow's get last night some reporters are using it as a way to yank the thread on Trump's finances some more. That's how this works. Alexander Butterfield's bombshell wouldn't have meant much if there hadn't been a solid years worth of slow rolling revelations. These things unfold.