HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Thursday, March 09, 2017

 
He loves strongmen and so do his followers

by digby






























I wrote about Trump and Russia and his authoritarian instincts for Salon this morning:


I don’t think there’s much doubt that Donald Trump is a very lucky man. You don’t fail up the way he has without a surfeit of good fortune (or without making a deal with the devil.) He inherited a fortune, and as much as he tried to lose it all he only ended up making more money. Now he’s the president of the most powerful nation on earth, and the first six weeks of his presidency have shown us that his good luck is holding. Trump is his own worst enemy, stepping on good press with tantrums and gaffes. His obvious unfitness and lack of preparation for the job becomes clearer every day. Somehow, something always intervenes to save him.

We don’t know what will happen with what Breitbart has dubbed “DeepStateGate.” The latest Wikileaks publication of secret CIA spying tools is morphing into a Bizarro World scandal in which the question of the hacking of a presidential campaign and possible connections between the president’s men and shadowy Russians is now about former President Barack Obama running a clandestine CIA “false flag” operation to pin the hacking on the Russians and implicate Trump.
Congressional investigations will now perhaps include both the Russian hacking and the possible Obama wiretapping which is another lucky break for the president. Republicans run those committees, and will be happy to flog whatever storyline will help their president.

This raises the question of whether people should get their hopes up about the Russian scandal revealing something impeachable. Of course there is enough evidence to investigate. A foreign government interfering in a democratic country’s election is a big problem. (And yes, I know the U.S. has done this as well. I think that’s a big problem too.)

But in my view investigators should devote as much time and energy as possible into following the money, since the conflicts of interest in Trump’s business career are unknown and he refuses to be even slightly transparent about his financial dealings anywhere in the world, including Russia. The Russian connection in that regard is compelling, independent of any collusion with the Putin government before the election.

For instance, Trump has said repeatedly he has no business in Russia but his son Donald Jr. gave an interview in 2008 that has been quoted widely and understood to mean that the Trumps have a lot of business in Russia. He talked about how difficult the business practices are there and how you can never be sure if you’re going to get your money back. The quote that’s made the rounds is this: “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets.”

But that’s truncated. This is the whole quote:


And in terms of high-end product influx into the US, Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets; say, in Dubai, and certainly with our project in SoHo and anywhere in New York. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia. There’s indeed a lot of money coming for new-builds and resale reflecting a trend in the Russian economy and, of course, the weak dollar versus the ruble.

In other words, when he said that Russians make up a disproportionate cross-section of their assets, he wasn’t talking about assets in Russia, he was talking about Russians investing in Trump properties in the U.S.


There may no direct espionage or collusion with Vladimir Putin that is likely to lead to impeachment, but the issue of corruption and conflict of interest is ripe for investigation and the Russian connection may lead to Trump being forced to release more information about his holdings. Remember, suspicious email server management was not the original purpose of the Benghazi investigation either. But it led to the FBI director tilting the election to Donald Trump, so you just never know what might happen.


Anyway, it’s really not necessary to believe that Trump is under Putin’s thumb to be concerned about Trump’s weird affection toward the Russian president. It seems weird for a man like Trump to be so dewy-eyed about an adversary, which is one of the main reasons people are suspicious. But the fact is that Trump has long admired strongman leadership.

His worship of the generals Patton and MacArthur, his compliments toward North Korea’s Kim Jong-un for his ability, despite his youth, to “take out his rivals,” his kudos to the Chinese Government for being “strong” by perpetrating the Tiananmen Square massacre, and even his alleged compliments to the murderous Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines are all examples of his admiration for authoritarian leaders. In the revised history of Trump’s supposed opposition to the Iraq war, he claimed it was because Saddam was a tough guy who knew how to fight terrorists. He seems to have a similar respect for Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, whom he called “much tougher and much smarter” than President Obama.

But there’s nobody over whom he’s been more moonstruck than Putin. Back in 2007, Trump appeared on Larry King’s CNN show and slammed George W. Bush hard, in comparison to the man he believed was showing great leadership. He said, “Whether you like him or don’t like him,” Putin was doing “a great job in rebuilding the image of Russia and also rebuilding Russia period.” In 2008 he told a Russian magazine, “I really like Vladimir Putin. I respect him. He does his job really well. Much better than our Bush.”


A few years later he told CNBC that a Putin op-ed for the New York Times was “tough and amazingly well-written,” a “masterpiece for Russia and a disaster for the U.S.,” and that it made Obama look like “a schoolchild.” He went on and on, culminating with a paean to Putin’s grand ambition: “He really becomes with this letter, almost the world leader … He really looks like he wants to take over the world.” Trump of course meant that in a good way.

Whether or not it turns out that there were back-channel deals with oligarchs, blackmail or collusion with the Russian government, our fundamental problem is that this country just elected a man who worships authoritarian strongmen. Throughout the campaign his “Make America Great Again” riff was used in service of a message of “toughness” and “strength,” and it brought forth huge cheers from his audience. What that means is that the millions of Americans who voted for him want an authoritarian strongman too.