HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Tuesday, September 12, 2017

 

Focused like a laser

by Tom Sullivan

Jonathan Chait observes certain parallels one can draw between Republicans and Democrats. While those can be sufficient to uphold the media's commitment to both-siderism, the similarities are superficial, he argues. Commenting on a Vox essay by political scientist Lee Drutman that looks at the threat posed by increasing political tribalism, Chait writes:

It is certainly true that the psychological relationship between the parties has a certain symmetry. Both fear each other will cheat to win and use their power to stack the voting deck. “If Republicans win in close elections, Democrats say it’s only because they cheated by making it harder for Democratic constituencies to vote; if Democrats win in close elections, Republicans say it’s only because they voted illegally.” But while it is not true that Democrats have allowed illegal voting in nontrivial levels, it is extremely true that Republicans have deliberately made voting inconvenient for Democratic-leaning constituencies. The psychology is parallel, but the underlying facts are not.
The same extends to other beliefs vs. behaviors. For the left, one could argue, that is because of the structures the right has in place for advancing an agenda. The conservative media and its think tanks, to name two. Rush Limbaugh may boast he's working with half his brain tied behind his back, but he has the advantage of not being constrained by a regard for the truth. The left tries to please a media still "open to contrary facts," Chait writes, while right-wing media pushes a consistent narrative heedless of them:
In the meantime, whatever the very real flaws in the American political and electoral system, it is simply impossible to design any kind of a system that can withstand a stress test like a major party captured by a faction as radical as the conservative movement. Its absence of limiting principles to its ideology, indifference to empirical evidence, and inability to concede failings of its dogma lead to an endless succession of failures explained away to the base as faintheartedness.

The doom loop Drutman describes is, in reality, both sides responding to the phenomenon of Republican extremism. Republicans are sealed off in a bubble of paranoia and rage, and Democrats are sealed off from that bubble. Democrats fear Republican government because it is dangerous and extreme. Republicans fear Democratic government because they are dangerous and extreme.
The conservative movement has convinced itself and quite a large swath of supporters that the real problem in this country is people less well-off than themselves. When foreign Others wane as potent bogeymen, the poor are the go-to stand-ins. Even as many struggling not to fall out of the middle class believe the president speaks for them, he and his party will be laser-focused on worsening their lot and keeping them from voting if they do. The Constitution may guarantee protections for anyone born or naturalized, but some wielding power think there ought to be a club fee to keep out the riffraff, i.e., the rest of us.

Catherine Rampell provides yet another example for the Washington Post. Republicans are promoting "an innovative way to punish the poor and simultaneously increase budget deficits." She writes:
To pull off this impressive twofer, they would put every American applying for the earned-income tax credit (EITC) through a sort of mini-audit before getting their refund. This would both place huge new burdens on the working poor and divert scarce Internal Revenue Service resources away from other audit targets, such as big corporations, that offer a much higher return on investment.
Business-minded conservatives, one would think, would legislate with an eye for the country's bottom line. It's just that their political bottom line comes first. The ostensible purpose is to target waste, fraud, and abuse, the free energy device of conservative economics and source of unlimited budgetary savings for offsetting the one percent's tax cuts. The result of auditing EITC applicants will be additional delays and hurdles for the working poor.
Recall that Republicans have been steadily cutting the IRS’s budget, which is a silly thing to do if you’re truly a fiscal conservative who believes in “law and order.” The IRS brings in far more money than it receives, particularly in its work going after tax cheats.

And cutting the IRS budget is an especially silly thing to do if you’re also giving the agency an enormous new mandate likely to crowd out other enforcement activities — including those that bring in much bigger paydays.
But as with the voter fraud snipe hunt, eliminating the impact of the the miniscule amount of cheating is not the point. Nor is the country's bottom line.

All the while the message from the right's Mighty Wurlizer to the base will be that "those people," the lesser-thans, are the real targets, not them. Even as their paychecks buy less and tax cuts help less, the base will believe.

Conveniently, the GOP will have help in furthering that notion from outside its think tanks and media outlets. The Daily Beast reveals that not only did Russia promote fake news on Facebook to aid Republicans' 2016 efforts, it promoted events as well:
The Facebook events—one of which echoed Islamophobic conspiracy theories pushed by pro-Trump media outlets—are the first indication that the Kremlin’s attempts to shape America’s political discourse moved beyond fake news and led unwitting Americans into specific real-life action.

“This is the next step,” Clint Watts, a former FBI agent and expert on Russia’s influence campaign, told The Daily Beast. “The objective of influence is to create behavior change. The simplest behavior is to have someone disseminate propaganda that Russia created and seeded. The second part of behavior influence is when you can get people to physically do something.”
In the days pre-Facebook, I collected right-wing, "pass it on" emails from around the Net and wondered if, rather than just enthusiastic wingnuts, there wasn't a think tank somewhere churning them out and circulating them to conservative email lists. I wonder now has anyone looked at whether the shop might have been in Russia?

* * * * * * * *

Request a copy of For The Win, my county-level election mechanics primer, at tom.bluecentury at gmail.