Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

Facebook: Digby Parton

@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)

thedigbyblog at gmail
satniteflix at gmail
publius.gaius at gmail
tpostsully at gmail
Spockosbrain at gmail
Richardein at me.com


Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic

Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Trump's enemies list should include himself

by digby

My Salon column today:

On June 27, 1973 former Nixon White House counsel John Dean mentioned that he had turned over a pile of documents to the Senate Watergate Committee and among them was a set of papers called “Opponents List and Political Enemies Project." In a 1971 memo included in the papers Dean described the purpose of the list:

This memorandum addresses the matter of how we can maximize the fact of our incumbency in dealing with persons known to be active in their opposition to our Administration; stated a bit more bluntly—how we can use the available federal machinery to screw our political enemies.

The "available machinery" included plans to deny them federal grants and contracts and use the IRS and the Justice Department to harass them. This was the infamous "Enemies List" and it included the names of journalists, Senators, House members, certain businessmen and labor leaders, entertainers and Democratic Party donors.

CBS newsman Daniel Schorr, obtained a copy later that day and read it live for the CBS News with Walter Cronkite only realizing he was on the list when he got to his name.  This first list only included 20 names but as the Watergate scandal unfolded over the next few months, more evidence emerged that there were more than one list which included over 200 names. In the end, the attempts to use the IRS to harass his critics and violate their constitutional rights became named among Nixon's abuse of power that made up the second article of impeachment.

Fast forward to 2018 and we have President Trump tweeting this yesterday morning:

The difference between Nixon and Trump is that Nixon at least had the sense to abuse his power in secret.

Trump has hinted broadly in the past that he would like to order the government to hurt Amazon but he used thin excuses about the Post Office being taken advantage of and the tax base being cheated. Everyone knew he was really angry at the Post but he didn't make it explicit. Yesterday he did. And by mentioning the antitrust issue he also lends credence to those who have suspected that his Department of Justice's objection to the AT&T Time Warner merger had a lot more to do with trying to damage CNN than any concern for media monopolies. (The Justice Department surprised observers when they decided to appeal the lower court's decisive ruling in favor of the merger.)

It appears that Trump is taking a page from the Nixon playbook and wants the government to harass and prosecute his enemies in the media. Nixon didn't get much cooperation when he tried it and it's likely Trump won't either. But the abuse of power is very much in the same vein.

And so is the bombshell his press secretary dropped in the White House briefing yesterday. When asked about a tweet by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)in which he claimed former CIA director John Brennan was "monetizing" his security clearance and should therefore be stripped of it, she replied:
Not only is the President looking to take away Brennan’s security clearance, he’s also looking into the clearances of Comey, Clapper, Hayden, Rice, and McCabe. The President is exploring the mechanisms to remove security clearance because they’ve politicized and, in some cases, monetized their public service and security clearances.

Making baseless accusations of improper contact with Russia or being influenced by Russia against the President is extremely inappropriate. And the fact that people with security clearances are making these baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence.

That's quite a list of enemies, no?

First there is no evidence that any of those people have exposed classified material, which would certainly be cause for taking away their clearance. Neither are any of them reported to have repeatedly failed to fully fill out their clearance forms and are otherwise suspected of some sort of nefarious activity as is Trump's son-in-law and Senior Adviser Jared Kushner, which would also be reason to strip them of security clearances. They aren't accused of domestic violence as was Trump's former staff secretary Rob Porter or any other violations as were the 30 Trump staffers who had their clearances downgraded or revoked last winter. If their clearances are revoked it would be purely as punishment for criticizing the president.

Rand Paul styles himself as the one true principled civil libertarian which raises the question about why he would be against these people exercising their first amendment right to free speech. It's true that this is a confusing set of circumstances since they were all previously powerful members of the Intelligence Community, but it's worth considering that from some perspectives some might even consider them whistleblowers and that Paul, the high-minded, small government libertarian, is taking Donald Trump's side against the "deep state" by suggesting that he abuse the power of the presidency to punish citizens who are speaking out against him. We do live in very strange times.

The charge that they are "monetizing" their clearances has to be an inside joke between Paul and Trump. The idea seems to be that their clearances are what give them credibility with the public but nobody knew until yesterday that they still had them so that's absurd.  For better or worse, their former jobs are what give them credibility and there's nothing Trump can do about that. The media are allowed to hire former government workers to give expert commentary on government and politics. At least they were up until now.

Moreover, the mere idea of anyone in Trump world objecting to someone "monetizing" their government service is hilarious. The president never divested of his businesses or provided his tax returns as every other president has done for decades. He spends nearly every week-end making personal appearances at his commercial properties and personally pockets the money the government spends to protect him there. His family is pretty much running their businesses out of the oval office and the cabinet is so overwhelmingly unethical that he's already had to fire two cabinet members for outrageous self-dealing with a couple more hanging by a thread. This flat-out corruption is one area where Nixon was a piker by comparison.

Finally, the man who tweets "Witch Hunt!" on a daily basis getting on his high horse complaining that people are making "baseless accusations of improper conduct"  is so absurd that you just have to laugh. If there is someone on this planet who is less self-aware I've never met him.