HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Tuesday, September 25, 2018

 
What going on with Rosenstein anyway?

by digby




My Salon column this morning:

Last Friday the New York Times published a bombshell story reporting that in May of 2017 Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggested that he and people interviewing for the job of FBI director should "wear a wire" to record the utterances of President Trump. He allegedly discussed rounding up members of the Cabinet to see if they were willing to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. Rosenstein immediately denied this, also saying that he does not believe the president is subject to the 25th Amendment. Some sources in the Justice Department have subsequently said that Rosenstein was just being sarcastic about the wire.

The Times stuck by its story that Rosenstein was serious about suggesting secretly recording the president but made it clear that there is no evidence that anyone ever followed through. As for the 25th Amendment comment, Rosenstein wouldn't be the only member of the Trump administration to suggest it. Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury," Bob Woodward's "Fear" and Omarosa's "Unhinged" all contain anecdotes about that option being suggested. (It has never been tried, and it's not at all clear how it would work.) The infamous anonymous New York Times op-ed writer -- identified in this Salon essay by literary scholar Don Foster as likely being Defense Secretary Jim Mattis -- also admitted it had been discussed. Let's face facts: Knowing what we know about this administration, it would much more shocking if nobody had ever brought it up.

The period when this supposedly happened was a particularly tumultuous time, even for this administration. Rosenstein was said to be upset that he'd been ill-used by the president when his memo about FBI Director James Comey's malpractice in his handling of the Clinton email investigation was used as a pretext for Comey's firing. That was especially true since Trump made it clear not long afterward, in his interview with Lester Holt, that he had dumped Comey in an effort to shut down the Russia investigation.

But that wasn't all the president had done. Recall that the day after the Comey firing Trump met with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in an unannounced, off-the-record meeting in the Oval Office. The president told his visitors he had fired the "nutjob" FBI director and said, "I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.” Then he proceeded to share sensitive classified information with the two Russians, making clear it had come from Israeli intelligence.

That period after Comey was fired obviously shook the FBI and the Justice Department. They were aware of Michael Flynn's lies, Russian interference in the election and quite likely other things we don't know about. It's hardly surprising that they would have been brainstorming such possibilities as the 25th Amendment.

Nobody knows who leaked this story to the Times. It was relayed through several layers of anonymity and is based mostly on hearsay about notes from two meetings that took place on the same day, documented by Department of Justice lawyer Lisa Page and the since-fired former FBI acting director, Andrew McCabe. There has been plenty of criticism of the Times for its sourcing on this story and it seems clear that the person or people from whom the information came are no friends of Rosenstein. He is portrayed as "erratic," "nervous" and "emotional," which suggests this story may have been planted in order to portray him as weak and unstable and lay the groundwork for his dismissal.

McCabe, who is facing a criminal probe for lying to the DOJ inspector general, adamantly denies providing his memos to the Times. He has said that he believes protecting the Mueller investigation is vital to the integrity of law enforcement and points out that he personally sacrificed to ensure that it was put on the right course. He wrote that "if the rumors of Deputy AG’s Rosenstein’s departure are true, I am deeply concerned that it puts that investigation at risk." He's clearly right about that.

After the Times story broke, Gabe Sherman at Vanity Fair reported that White House communications director and former Fox News president Bill Shine was launching a major campaign for Rosentein's ouster, and that Fox luminaries Laura Ingraham and Jeanine Pirro immediately got on board. But that same night Sean Hannity took to the Fox airwaves to addressed the president directly, claiming he had it on good authority that the story was a set-up and that Trump shouldn't fire Rosenstein or anyone else. Ingraham and the others quickly reversed course and the president didn't make a move.

Fast forward to Monday, when amid all the Kavanaugh Sturm und Drang Axios reported that Rosenstein had resigned and had been summoned to the White House, sending the media into convulsions. That clearly wasn't true, and subsequent reports in other media suggested that Rosenstein was about to be fired, the difference being relevant to what happens next with the Mueller probe. That's a complicated issue that sheds little light on why Rosenstein would either choose to resign or force the president to fire him. It's a bad situation either way.

The White House at first offered no talking points, and it seemed nobody had a clue what was really going on. Rosenstein met with White House chief of staff John Kelly and reportedly spoke on the phone with Trump in New York, after which it was announced that the two men would meet on Thursday. The New York Times' "tick-tock" of the day's events once again portrayed Rosenstein as "emotional" in his meetings and calls on Monday, banging yet another nail in his coffin.

This is a confounding story. Only the Times knows who's leaking these "erratic" Rosenstein tales and it's not clear its reporters know whether they are being used for nefarious purposes (or whether they care). According to Vanity Fair's Sherman, the White House is pushing the Rosenstein drama in hopes of burying the growing scandal around Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, which could explain a Thursday meeting was scheduled between Trump and Rosenstein, in direct conflict with the Senate hearing at which Kavanaugh and his initial accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, will testify. Hannity and company are of course insisting this is all a set-up by the "deep state" and the Democrats. Whatever the motive, the consequence is a week of unbelievable chaos. Perhaps that's the idea.

One thing is clear, however. The Justice Department and the FBI are now following the lead of the White House, breaking down into competing camps with opaque agendas and self-serving leaks to the media. Bureaucratic infighting is certainly nothing new. But the crudeness of it, with the nasty personal jibes at Rosenstein and a clear intention to provoke an angry explosion by the president, is a very Trumpian strategy. His "Mad Max" management style is infecting the entire government and in fact the entire culture.

.