HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Friday, November 09, 2018

 
Is Whittaker the latest Scaramucci?

by digby




My Salon column this morning:

Less than 24 hours after the polls had closed ---  and immediately after President Trump delivered one of his most petulant press conference tantrums --- the word went forth that he had finally rid himself of hated Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the man whose crime against him was to follow the rules. It's been obvious since the day Sessions showed that he held to the old-fashioned notion that in order to function as the highest law enforcement official in the country, his personal reputation and appearance of integrity were more important than fealty to the president, that his days were numbered.

Trump tried hard to get him to quit but Sessions refused to leave his dream job until he'd remade the country into Alabama circa 1952. He made a good stab at it, (even gratuitously granting police even more power as one last slap in the face to civil libertarians on his way out the door.) But Trump's ego just couldn't allow him to continue no matter how skillfully and efficiently he was carrying out the president's agenda.

Trump didn't do the normal thing and put the Deputy Attorney general in charge until a new person could be confirmed by the Senate. Of course he didn't. He named a completely unqualified toady by the name of Matthew Whittaker who had been serving as Jeff Sessions' Chief of staff for the past year. Nobody seems to know exactly how he came to have that particular job, but what is known is that he was a small time political player from Iowa who once served as a US Attorney and more recently was a crony of Sam Clovis, the Iowa politico who worked Trump campaign and got himself all caught up in the Russia investigation and had to resign his sinecure at the Department of Agriculture. Clovis reportedly advised him to go to New York and become a TV Trump defender and get noticed by the president so he could get a judicial appointment.

He had been working as a sole practitioner for a far right dark money funded organization called Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust aka FACT where he disseminated "legal opinions" in the media in support of Republican politics. He is, in other words, a political hack and he didn't operate at a very high level. But he did apparently impress the president with his extreme sycophancy so he went directly from guest hits on CNN to Chief of Staff to the Attorney General. And now he is the Acting Attorney General himself.

This shouldn't be too surprising, really. Recall that Trump wanted to make his personal pilot the head of the FAA. He brought in his totally inexperience son-in-law to run his middle east policy and much else. His daughter is a senior staffer. That's how things work in Trumpworld.

Of course, there's more to it than that. Whittaker spent his time in the media during the summer of 2017 vociferously defending Trump against the Mueller investigation which he is now overseeing. Among his greatest hits:

David Corn of Mother Jones reported on a radio interview in which he claimed that the president has unlimited power over the Justice Department:
“There is no case for obstruction of justice because the president has all the power of the executive and delegates that to people like the FBI director and the attorney general…The president could and has in our nation’s history said stop investigating this person or please investigate this other person.”

Referring to the Comey firing, he said “There’s really nothing here...This is power that is completely vested in the president…If he wanted to he could have told Jim [Comey] to stop investigating former [Defense Intelligence Agency] director Flynn. And he didn’t…I’m sure he made his preference known. Quite frankly, he’s president of the United States. He can do that.”

The Daily Beast reported that he stated unequivocally that there was no collusion:
“The truth is there was no collusion with the Russians and the Trump campaign. There was interference by the Russians into the election, but that was not collusion with the campaign. That’s where the left seems to be combining those two issues.The last thing they want right now is for the truth to come out, and for the fact that there’s not a single piece of evidence that demonstrates that the Trump campaign had any illegal or any improper relationships with the Russians. It’s that simple...The real Russian ties were with Hillary Clinton.

According to CNN's Andrew Kaczynski, who gathered many of these quotes, he has already concluded there was no obstruction of justice either:
Let's assume that the President asked him to stop investigating Flynn. That doesn't rise to the level of obstruction of justice and it doesn't sound to me, based on what's been reported, that Jim Comey, as he sat there, believed that the President was telling him to stop the investigation.
 Let's just say that his position on the Mueller probe couldn't be any clearer.

The Washington Post reported that two people close to Whitaker said he does not plan to take himself off the Russia case. They also said he likely won't approve any presidential subpoena which undoubtedly made Rudy Giuliani very happy. Who needs the aggravation?

But perhaps Whittaker might be persuaded to rethink that by someone he trusts, himself:




That may be the most sensible thing he's said about this entire matter.

CNN reported late on Thursday that the White House is surprised by all the blowback and they are starting to get worried. They had no idea he was nothing more than a cheap flak who'd been flapping his lips all over the media about the Mueller investigation for months before he mysteriously became Jeff Sessions' right-hand man:

It was not widely known among White House staff that he'd commented repeatedly on the special counsel's investigation in interviews and on television -- which is ironic given that this is what drew President Donald Trump to him and raises continued questions over the depth of the administration's vetting process.

That machine is as well-oiled as ever.

There has been much anticipation that the Mueller investigation is coming to a head. Something may have even happened already. Things are moving very fast. But you have to wonder if this man Whittaker is going to end up going the Scaramucci route. It kind of feels like it.

The question is how much damage he can do before he exits the scene. (He already got to work issuing a new, probably unlawful, order to require asylum seekers to only apply through authorized ports of entry.) If nothing else he will have been briefed on all the details of the Mueller investigation and he has undoubtedly already shared every single one of them with Donald Trump. That's what he's there for. It's all right out in the open.

.