HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Monday, January 14, 2019

 
He's just a president, standing in front of a strongman, asking him to love him.

by digby



My Salon column this morning:

The New York Times' Peter Baker's lede in Sunday's newspaper was one I don't think anyone ever expected to see:
“So it has come to this: The president of the United States was asked over the weekend whether he is a Russian agent. And he refused to answer.”
That comment specifically refers to a question posed to the president by Fox News' Jeanine Pirro in reference to the big New York Times story over the week-end reporting that in the wake of the firing of James Comey and Trump's suspicious behavior surrounding that event, the FBI finally realized that they needed to open a counterintelligence investigation into the president himself. We don't know whether that probe is still active, but one can safely assume that it was folded into the Special Prosecutor's portfolio along with a number of other investigations that had been opened into Russian spying, sabotage and cyber-propaganda over the course of the presidential campaign.

Salon's Andrew O'Hehir took a deep dive into the details and political implications on Sunday, particularly noting the fact that while many of us have concluded that there was plenty of evidence Trump was compromised and this was just the last straw, the right sees it as more evidence of a "Deep State Coup." Getting one's hopes up that there will soon be a biartisan consensus on this is as remote as ever.

But that wasn't the only Russia story that hit this weekend. The Washington Post reported that Trump's infamous private meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the past two years are even more suspicious that we were led to believe. And it seems to have especially alarmed some of the people who know about such things:



The Atlantic's Natasha Bertrand pointed out that Laufman is the former chief of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section at DOJ and oversaw parts of the Russia investigation until he left DOJ last year.

We knew, of course, that Trump had gone to some lengths to speak privately with Putin, but the new reporting shows that he's gone to greater lengths than we knew to hide the details, going so far as  confiscating the notes from at least one of his interpreters at the 2017 G20 and giving instructions not to discuss the meeting with members of his administration. (Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson did attend that meeting .) You'll recall that Trump was also later revealed to have had a long private conversation with Putin at the official G20 banquet.




As Marcy Wheeler and others have pointed out, Trump later admitted that they discussed "adoptions" at this little tête-à-tête which just happened to take place the night before Trump dictated that dishonest response to the New York Times on Air Force One claiming the notorious Trump Tower meeting with Don Jr and all those Russians was an innocent discussion about ... adoptions.

The Post revealed something else about that Hamburg meeting that was quite startling. The American interpreter in the room during refused to discuss the details of the meeting with officials from the National Security Council but did report that Trump responded “I believe you” after Putin denied any Russian involvement in the U.S. election.

It must have been quite a chat. He tweeted this on the way home:



The experts all dismissed that as the daft notion it was, but Trump brought it up again at the notorious Helsinki meeting last summer. This time he refused to have anyone but the interpreters present for the two hours he spent with Putin before appearing in what may be the most horrifying press conference of his tenure --- and that's saying something.

Standing beside the Russian president, when asked about the election and if he would denounce the Russian interference, this is what he said:
So let me just say that we have two thoughts. You have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server -- haven't they taken the server. Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee?I've been wondering that, I've been asking that for months and months and I've been tweeting it out and calling it out on social media. Where is the server? I want to know where is the server and what is the server saying?

With that being said, all I can do is ask the question. My people came to me, Dan Coats came to me and some others, they said they think it's Russia. I have President Putin; he just said it's not Russia.

I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be. But I really do want to see the server.

But I have -- I have confidence in both parties. I -- I really believe that this will probably go on for a while, but I don't think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the DNC? Where are those servers? They're missing; where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton's e-mails? 33,000 e-mails gone -- just gone. I think in Russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. I think it's a disgrace that we can't get Hillary Clinton's 33,000 e-mails.

So I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.

And what he did is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators with respect to the 12 people. I think that's an incredible offer. OK?

Needless to say, beneath that river of incoherent drivel, he managed to make it quite clear to the whole world, as Putin looked on smugly, that he would not or could not, say one word of condemnation for Russia's behavior.

The Post reported that officials “said they were never able to get a reliable readout of the president’s two-hour meeting in Helsinki.” Experts in these matters explain that the fact there was no American record of what was said in the meeting meant that Putin could say Trump agreed to anything he wanted and there would be nothing Trump could do about it.  But that's a silly thing to worry about. After the press conference, it was obvious that Trump was happy to appear before the whole world and agree to anything Putin proposed.

The Democrats say they will call the interpreter to testify before the Intelligence Committee, which could potentially answer the more serious concern. Is Putin exercising leverage over Trump in these private meetings or is Trump truly just a president, standing in front of a strongman, asking him to love him?



.