HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Saturday, July 06, 2019

 

Real Americans don't ask

by Tom Sullivan


F-35 Lightning. Photo Public Domain via Wikipedia.

"After spending trillions on endless wars in the Middle East over the past few decades," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) tweeted July 4, "I don’t want to hear one person tell me that we can’t afford to invest in free public colleges and universities."

For that matter, how exactly do we “pay for” Medicare for All? Yves Smith asked facetiously in an April 2018 post:

  • The same way that we just “paid for” $700,000,000,000 for a single year of military funding.
  • The same way that we just “paid for” $1,500,000,000,000 in tax cuts for the wealthy.
  • The same way that we “paid for” a $1,300,000,000,000 fighter jet in 2016.
  • The same way that the United States has always “paid for” all of the fantastically-expensive things that benefit the powerful: Immediately and without discussion. Because they want it.
Khanna linked to a July 2018 Buzzfeed opinion piece by Lindsay Koshgarian, National Priorities Project Director at the Institute for Policy Studies. Koshgarian challenges Village thinking on such spending as well as the cost of maintaining a global empire:
When Donald Trump lashed out at our NATO allies for not spending enough money on defense, he unintentionally highlighted just how expensive the US’s military spending addiction really is. If we trimmed our defense budget down to the 2% of GDP that Trump demanded of the NATO countries, it would free up about $3 trillion over the next decade, as the Washington Post’s Jeff Stein noted.
Estimates are all over the place on just what the U.S. spends annually to maintain its global empire. In part, because the Pentagon hides an unspecified chunk of it. The Institute for Policy studies estimated in 2009 the United States "spends approximately $250 billion annually to maintain troops, equipment, fleets, and bases overseas." Well over 800 foreign bases, to be inexact, part of a military complex that included (at the time) 545,000 facilities at 5,300 sites both in the United States and around the globe. Politico estimated the costs of overseas adventurism at $160 to $200 billion for 2014.

The Nation published new estimates in January 2019 based on the Pentagon's 2017 Base Structure Report. Nick Turse elaborates:
Officially, the Department of Defense (DoD) maintains 4,775 “sites,” spread across all 50 states, eight US territories, and 45 foreign countries. A total of 514 of these outposts are located overseas, according to the Pentagon’s worldwide property portfolio.
The most recent report fails to list bases known to exist but officially unacknowledged.
The Department of Defense even boasts that its “locations” include 164 countries. Put another way, it has a military presence of some sort in approximately 84 percent of the nations on this planet ...
Bases. Sites. Facilities. Installations. Outposts. Locations. How many there are and what they cost depends on what they're called and how they're counted. Many, out of sight, out of mind, and off-budget.

Real Americans™ don't ask, "How you are going to pay for it?" Until it comes to domestic spending.

"It just seems like their pockets are only empty when we're talking about education and investing in human capital in the United States: education, healthcare, housing, and investing in the middle class," future member of Congress, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told Pod Save America last August.

Yves Smith continued:
Spending even one more second discussing how we will pay for Medicare for All (or any program that benefits the powerless) is a supreme and cosmic waste of time. In fact, the entire “pay for” question is a sham and a scam, and a trap and a trick. It is cruel and unfair to the millions and millions of Americans that are suffering from ailments, stress, red tape, and bankruptcy.
Smith appended an April 2018 LOLGOP/Eclecta Blog interview with Stephanie Kelton, professor of public policy and economics at Stony Brook University. Kelton is a former chief economist on the U.S. Senate Budget Committee in 2015 and in 2016, and was senior economic adviser to Bernie Sanders’s 2016 presidential campaign. Without diving into Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)* and pretending I understand it, I'll offer her moral and strategic argument for not getting tripped up by the "pay for it" ploy:
I am a strong advocate of encouraging Democrats to pick separate fights. [I believe they should stop linking] the fight of increasing taxes on the rich with the desire to increase spending on programs the Democrats like. For example, to say that you want to make public colleges and universities tuition free and the way we’re going to do that is through a tax on Wall Street speculation. Or we’re going to tax the rich to pay for Medicare for All. Or we’re going to close tax loopholes to do infrastructure. Or whatever the case may be.

I am absolutely in favor of dealing with disparities [such as] income and wealth inequality, and concentrations of wealth in the hands of a smaller and smaller few. It’s bad for democracy, it’s bad for the functioning of our economy. There are a whole bunch of reasons why I will make the case for increasing taxes on the wealthy.

I will not make the argument that we need to increase taxes on the wealthy in order to pay for crumbling infrastructure and take care of the elderly and so forth. Here’s the reason why: I think it’s cruel and unfair to the sick and the poor and the hungry and to our environment and everything else. To tie these fights together in a way that says, “unless and until.” Unless and until we can “win” on higher taxes, whether it’s carbon tax or [any other kind]. Unless and until we can get the money from “them,” we can’t take care of our people or communities or planet.

That drives me mad. I don’t think we have time to wait around while we try to pick a few [billions] off the billionaire class before we deal with the really serious threats that we face today. We have to decouple these fights. You fight for higher taxes by all means. Go and have that fight. But don’t link success on the other front to your success on [this one]. I’ve watched it fail and fail and fail.
If modern fiscal conservatives were running the show in 1941, they might have dithered over costs while Europe and the Pacific fell to tyranny. Except they wouldn't have. Real Americans™ don't ask, "How you are going to pay for it?" when the exercise involves war spending that lines the right people's pockets. Nor do they ask when a would-be autocrat — another "small man in search of a balcony" — asks taxpayers to finance his militarized effort to show other autocrats he is one of them. They have their priorities. It's just that their priorities are not those of sixty-plus percent of the American public.

Meanwhile, starved of funds, the birthplace of American liberty descends further into disrepair.**

* What Is Modern Monetary Theory (with Stephanie Kelton, Pitchfork Economics podcast April 23, 2019)

** [h/t Susie Madrak]