HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Friday, November 29, 2019

 

#Fail That Must Not Be Named

by Tom Sullivan


Wall Street bull statue. Photo by Glen Scarborough via Flickr [CC BY-SA 2.0], 2009.

It's the young. It's the libs. It's substance abuse. It's definitely not metastatic capitalism.

Conservatives have sounded the alarm about birthrates in the West since Mark Steyn's "It's the Demography, Stupid" appeared in the Wall Street Journal in 2006, if not much earlier. The West is at war, Steyn argued. At war with Others From Another Culture. With their unholy higher birthrates, those Others will soon replace white-Christian Real Americans™ and Europeans.

Our problem is lack of "civilizational confidence," Steyn argued. For which the remedy, no doubt, is some form of civilizational Viagra. A little blue pill here, a little "kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out" over there.

Since then, that dog whistle claxon has reappeared periodically in different forms, some with actual evidence to support the data if not the sentiments. Lately, the argument has shifted from white-Christian cultural survival (The Muslims are coming!) to an economic one that still doesn't address the economy's dysfunction.

"The American Conservative" in October lamented European youths' lack of vigor in the area of reproduction:

"The problem of low birthrates ultimately lies internally, within Europe’s culture and social life. A young generation that doesn’t aspire to have families and that’s increasingly alienated from any sense of community has driven much of the crisis."
Those damned kids!

David Atkins replies, "that, or the fact that the brutality of modern capitalism combined with gerontocratic control of government means that young people can't afford to have kids."

It's the economic system? Blasphemy!

Or is it?

Joel Achenbach wrote in the Washington Post this week about a report in the Journal of the American Medical Association examining a decline in longevity among Americans despite the insane amounts spent in the U.S. on health care. Between 2010 and 2017, there has been a 29 percent rise in the death rate among people age 25 to 34. This, of course, is not supposed to happen in the land of the free and the home the greenback:
About a third of the estimated 33,000 “excess deaths” that the study says occurred since 2010 were in just four states: Ohio, Pennsylvania, Kentucky and Indiana — the first two of which are critical swing states in presidential elections. The state with the biggest percentage rise in death rates among working-age people in this decade — 23.3 percent — is New Hampshire, the first primary state.

“It’s supposed to be going down, as it is in other countries,” said the lead author of the report, Steven H. Woolf, director emeritus of the Center on Society and Health at Virginia Commonwealth University. “The fact that that number is climbing, there’s something terribly wrong.”
At New York Magazine's "Intelligencer," Eric Levitz comments on how "deaths of despair" as well as delayed childbearing contribute to lowering birthrates. Perhaps it is "women making the conscious choice to delay reproduction until they can gain a more secure foothold in the labor market." As Atkins said.

Levitz writes:
Yet because the structure of our economy incentivizes couples to delay reproduction — and penalizes those who have children early in their careers — this is only to some extent a choice. In the abstract, it may be preferable for men and women to start families in their 20s when they tend to be slightly healthier and more likely to have the aid of grandparents. The problem is it’s increasingly difficult for young Americans to attain a relatively stable, middle-class existence until later in life. Surveys suggest that, were it not for this fact, America’s fertility rate would be higher: A significant percentage of American women say they would like to have more children but only if they could afford to do so. The misalignment of a human being’s prime reproductive years and a worker’s prime earning years is impossible to resolve (at least under capitalism), but the U.S. government could do more to mitigate the issue through pro-natal social policies. Regardless, the CDC’s findings confirm the utter inviability of the nativist right’s vision for America. Although child allowances and public day care may facilitate marginal increases in birth rates, all available evidence suggests that such policies would be insufficient to ward off demographic (and thus economic) decline in the absence of a robustly expansionary immigration regime.
Despite the marketing, you can't have it all. Even in God-bless America. You cannot have a xenophobic, white-nationalist, über-capitalist America without cultural and economic decline over time. Even, perhaps, with more "pro-natal social policies." Not that by eroding women's reproductive autonomy the right isn't trying hard to indirectly mandate reproduction, as the "handmaids" protests contend.

Rising short-term mortality rates among white Americans "'seems driven principally by anxiety among whites about losing social status,' even though there is no evidence that they are in fact worse off," a University of Toronto study suggests:
"The anxiety of whites is coming from a misperception that their dominant status in society is being threatened, which is manifesting in multiple forms of psychological and physiological stress," said Siddiqi, who also holds an academic appointment at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

These psychological and physiological stressors are resulting in more "deaths of despair"—due to alcohol consumption, opioid use, drug overdose and suicide—and, to a lesser extent, rising chronic disease, including hypertension and obesity, according to the study. This widespread decline in health status is actually consistent with—and may even reinforce—a despair-based explanation for worsening white health, explains Siddiqi.
Black mortality rates are going down while white mortality rates rise and white birthrates decline. This, of course, is the real source of fretting over low birthrates with respect to those Others. As Steyn and other conservatives imply, the Others are coming to do to whites what whites historically did to them. They blame the young, the libs, or substance abuse for trends that threaten white social status and are, studies suggest, driving them to drink or worse.

But heaven forfend we should weigh metastasized, free-market, financialized, monopoly capitalism and find it wanting.