HOME



Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405



Facebook: Digby Parton

Twitter:
@digby56
@Gaius_Publius
@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)
@spockosbrain



emails:
Digby:
thedigbyblog at gmail
Dennis:
satniteflix at gmail
Gaius:
publius.gaius at gmail
Tom:
tpostsully at gmail
Spocko:
Spockosbrain at gmail
tristero:
Richardein at me.com








Infomania

Salon
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Slate
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic


Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Hullabaloo


Monday, March 12, 2018

 

Epistemology in the Trump era

by Tom Sullivan


Image via Science.

What is truth? And how do we know?

That question is the heart of the matter. Does anyone care? is more to the point. Robinson Meyer examines for The Atlantic a recent study published in Science on fake news and the Twitter users who love it:

The massive new study analyzes every major contested news story in English across the span of Twitter’s existence—some 126,000 stories, tweeted by 3 million users, over more than 10 years—and finds that the truth simply cannot compete with hoax and rumor. By every common metric, falsehood consistently dominates the truth on Twitter, the study finds: Fake news and false rumors reach more people, penetrate deeper into the social network, and spread much faster than accurate stories.
As if we needed a study.

They taught computers to differentiate between accurate stories and spurious ones, then tracked how both spread. Using a "state-of-the-art sentiment-analysis tool," researchers at MIT also found false stories are more novel, sparking retweets. The report itself found "the truth inspired replies that expressed greater sadness."

Spread lies, be happy. Cue Bobby McFerrin.

The study did not look at recent bot activity, but rather across the entire existence of Twitter. On that time span, they found little effect of bots in furthering the spread of false stories, concluding "human behavior contributes more to the differential spread of falsity and truth than automated robots do."

Rebekah Tromble, a professor of political science at Leiden University in the Netherlands responded in an email, “The key takeaway is really that content that arouses strong emotions spreads further, faster, more deeply, and more broadly on Twitter.” Researchers have not applied the same process to Facebook, but believe the results would be similar.

Even for readers already into a fifth of scotch, the analysis is sobering.

An accompanying article in Science considered interventions for staunching the unreality bleed. The prospects are not good:
Fact checking might even be counterproductive under certain circumstances. Research on fluency—the ease of information recall—and familiarity bias in politics shows that people tend to remember information, or how they feel about it, while forgetting the context within which they encountered it. Moreover, they are more likely to accept familiar information as true (10). There is thus a risk that repeating false information, even in a fact-checking context, may increase an individual's likelihood of accepting it as true. The evidence on the effectiveness of claim repetition in fact checking is mixed (11).
The team called for (emphasis mine) "interdisciplinary research to reduce the spread of fake news and to address the underlying pathologies."

As if we needed a study.

Reading through the reports brought to mind Tom Wolfe's essay, "O Rotten Gotham: Sliding Down into the Behavioral Sink" (1968?). His tramp through New York with anthropologist Edward T. Hall spawned an essay in how overcrowding would inevitably lead in humans, as it does among rats, to disease and social dysfunction, even mass die-offs. In an over-crowded colony, a few male rats prosper and collect harems while the rest of the colony falls into chaos.

Wolfe wrote:
Most politicians are like the aristocrat rats. They are insulated from The Sink by practically sultanic buffers — limousines chauffeurs, secretaries, aides-de-camp, doormen, shuttered houses, high-floor apartments they almost never ride subways, fight rush-hours, much less live in the slums or work in the Pan-Am Building.

Overcrowding in rural America, of course, is as rare as voter fraud and does not explain the joie de vivre with which Trumpian crowds celebrate every falsehood uttered by their king. They cheered again Saturday night in Moon Township, Pennsylvania. But it is hard not to look at the false news study and feel America, with its widening gulf between haves and anxious have-nots, with its males engaging in (quoting Wolfe) "unprovoked and senseless assault upon one another," as happened in Hall's rat colonies, in Las Vegas, and in Parkland, Florida, is another manifestation of The Sink.

"Social-media platforms do not encourage the kind of behavior that anchors a democratic government," writes Meyer.

As if we needed a study.

* * * * * * * *

Request a copy of For The Win, my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.