Digby's Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

Facebook: Digby Parton

@BloggersRUs (Tom Sullivan)

thedigbyblog at gmail
satniteflix at gmail
publius.gaius at gmail
tpostsully at gmail
Spockosbrain at gmail
Richardein at me.com


Mother Jones
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
American Prospect
New Republic

Denofcinema.com: Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley review archive

January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Saturday, April 21, 2018


Money vs. boots

by Tom Sullivan

Let's talk money.

Politics is a rich person's pastime. The money involved for the highest-profile races is staggering. The personal commitments are a burden. It leaves many of us feeling impotent to do anything more than yell at the TV. Public financing — "getting money out of politics" — is the standard answer, and a good one, but it is not the only one.

Sarah Jones examines the costs and opportunities for The New Republic and finds a slow, but growing movement towards public financing. "Campaign finance reform is not typically framed as an inequality story, but it is one, she writes:

According to Demos, 27 states, counties, and cities now implement public financing of some kind. Public financing doesn’t necessarily keep big donors or outside money from influencing a race. But it does make it easier for low-income people to participate in the democratic process by supporting candidates who represent their interests. Candidates who opted into Seattle’s program ran on strong, progressive platforms that supported the city’s $15 minimum wage and brought attention to the city’s housing crisis. Two Latinx candidates eventually won election.

In races for other seats, however, candidates from low-income backgrounds find themselves stymied by other roadblocks. It takes time to run a campaign, and that’s something many low-income people can’t afford. In most states, employees aren’t protected from termination if they take time off work to run for office, and even if they win office, the salary varies wildly from state to state. “Sometimes these positions are part-time as well, and it’s not always feasible for folks who are living paycheck to paycheck to not only get that job as a legislator, but also to campaign,” Boldt explained. The situation is particularly complicated for candidates with children. “For example, people with small children need to provide care for their kids. And in a lot of places, campaign funds can’t be spent on childcare,” she added.
The hurdles are formidable, but not insurmountable.
Kerri Harris, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Delaware, works a full-time job as a community organizer in addition to campaigning for office. She has, at various points in her working life, cut grass and fried chicken at a convenience store. She told me that her experiences with financial hardship both motivate and complicate her campaign. “I actually had a look in running last summer. We put out feelers, had a number of meet-and-greets, people were excited about it. But when October came, I had to sit down and really re-evaluate,” she said. “I am a parent and I have responsibilities and I don’t make a lot of money.”
Eventually, Harris built a volunteer team for her challenging incumbent Senator Tom Carper in the September primary.

“At the same time I’m running this campaign, saying people shouldn’t be struggling, I’m not saying it as if it’s those people. I am those people, and they see it,” she tells Jones. Harris the candidate now attends fundraisers she could not afford to, let's face it, as a commoner.

In politics, the wealthy wield money as a weapon to attack opponents and defend what they intend to keep. Campaign finance reform would even the playing field, but candidates such as Harris first need power to un-rig the money game and ungerrymander districts drawn to be uncompetitive. Short of being born with preternatural fundraising skills, the way to win that power is better organizing.

Directly and through groups he funded, Art Pope, North Carolina’s own mini-Koch brother, threw nearly a million dollars at state Sen. John Snow’s district in the western mountains in the 2010 election. They targeted Snow with two dozen mass mailings. One, Jane Mayer wrote in The New Yorker, reminiscent of the infamous Willie Horton ad from 1988:
“The attacks just went on and on,” Snow told me recently. “My opponents used fear tactics. I’m a moderate, but they tried to make me look liberal.” On Election Night, he lost by an agonizingly slim margin—fewer than two hundred votes.

After the election, the North Carolina Free Enterprise Foundation, a nonpartisan, pro-business organization, revealed that two seemingly independent political groups had spent several hundred thousand dollars on ads against Snow—a huge amount in a poor, backwoods district. Art Pope was instrumental in funding and creating both groups, Real Jobs NC and Civitas Action. Real Jobs NC was responsible for the “Go fish!” ad and the mass mailing that attacked Snow’s “pork projects.” The racially charged ad was produced by the North Carolina Republican Party, and Pope says that he was not involved in its creation. But Pope and three members of his family gave the Davis campaign a four-thousand-dollar check each—the maximum individual donation allowed by state law.

Snow, whose defeat was first chronicled by the Institute for Southern Studies, a progressive nonprofit organization, told me, “It’s getting to the point where, in politics, money is the most important thing. They spent nearly a million dollars to win that seat. A lot of it was from corporations and outside groups related to Art Pope. He was their sugar daddy.”
Yet even after all that Pope money, the last Democratic senator standing in the far west, lost his seat by 161 votes in a district spanning 8 rural counties. If Democrats in those rural counties had mounted effective, coordinated get-out-the-vote programs, they might have turned out 200 more votes among those 8 counties to deny Pope his prize and hold that seat for Democrats. Snow could not compete with Pope's money. But he might have had local Democrats had "game."

Coincidentally, the district's Democrats are working on that with a series of trainings, including one starting as this post goes live. Organizers from South Carolina have come over the border to join them.

The point of the "For The Win" primer (below) is that winning tough races needn't require Pope-sized pockets or candidates with Obama-level charisma. Better organizing and planning can get the job done. It does right here:

With so many new post-November 2016 progressive activists in the campaign mix this year, and with so many Democrats running in normally uncompetitive districts, Democrat cannot afford for them to learn in the traditional way, by the seat of their pants over multiple election cycles. They need those skills NOW.

A poll from Quinnipiac University of registered voters shows Democratic Rep. Beto O'Rourke within single digits (47-44) of catching incumbent Sen. Ted Cruz in the Texas U.S. Senate race. (CNN has more detail here.) But registered voters is one thing. Turning out Democrats and independents is an other. That takes not just money, but skills. The redder the state, the more urgent the need and, likely, the larger the skills deficit among under-resourced counties.

After sending links to 210 Texas county chairs in December (I could find no contact info for the rest), over 50 downloaded "For The Win" within 48 hours.

Hi, Ted!

* * * * * * * *

For The Win 2018 is ready for download. Request a copy of my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.